| | | | | | |

Engineering Sample 506E8


Performance
211.6k points

Description
We need your help: we don't have results in all modes. If you have a 506E8 and want to help us to complete the stats, you just have to run the benchmark at stock frequency (no oc) in modes FPU, SSE, AVX, and validate the results. You don't have to register and the whole process will take less than 3 minutes per mode.

The Engineering Sample 506E8 is a cpu manufactured by Intel that was released on June 2016. This model has 4 Kaby Lake cores with HyperThreading, runs at 2400 MHz as base frequency and has a a thermal design power of - W.

The first Kaby Lake CPU was released in August 2016. It uses a 14 nm process and was the first architecture in breaking the previous tick-tock model. Actually, it is not that different from the preceding Skylake: it has 64kB of L1 cache and 256kB L2 cache per core.

Specs
Official name
Genuine Intel(R) CPU 0000 @ 2.40GHz
CPUID
506e8
Core
Kaby Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
TDP
- W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
Release date
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
56.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
211.6k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
Multithread
Test#1 (Integers)
23.91k
95.3k (x4.0)
Test#2 (FP)
21.03k
91.94k (x4.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.05k
22.06k (x4.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.4k
2.3k (x0.4)
TOTAL
56.39k
211.6k (x3.8)

Motherboards where this CPU was tested
Model
Chipset
Release date
Intel Z270
N/A

RAM models tested along with this CPU
Model
Type
Frequency
Size
DDR4
2400 MHz
8 GB
DDR4
2400 MHz
4 GB

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [% vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [% vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [% vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [% vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [% vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.coma


Test#2 (FP) [% vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.coma


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [% vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.coma


Test#1 (Memory) [% vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.coma

Similar CPUs to Engineering Sample 506E8
Engineering Sample 506E8 (This model)
 Mode AVX2 monothread  [56.39k points]
 Mode AVX2 multithread  [211.6k points]
 Mode AVX2 monothread  [54.55k points -3.26%]
 Mode AVX2 multithread  [229k points +8.23%]
 Mode AVX2 monothread  [58.05k points +2.96%]
 Mode AVX2 multithread  [210.91k points -0.33%]
 Mode AVX2 monothread  [59.68k points +5.84%]
 Mode AVX2 multithread  [243.18k points +14.93%]
 Mode AVX2 monothread  [52.69k points -6.55%]
 Mode AVX2 multithread  [333.31k points +57.52%]
 Mode AVX2 monothread  [56.72k points +0.60%]
 Mode AVX2 multithread  [182.47k points -13.76%]
 Mode AVX2 monothread  [56.29k points -0.17%]
 Mode AVX2 multithread  [208.33k points -1.55%]
 Mode AVX2 monothread  [66.74k points +18.36%]
 Mode AVX2 multithread  [229.2k points +8.32%]
 Mode AVX2 monothread  [65.35k points +15.89%]
 Mode AVX2 multithread  [243.18k points +14.93%]
 Mode AVX2 monothread  [60.06k points +6.51%]
 Mode AVX2 multithread  [227.67k points +7.60%]
 Mode AVX2 monothread  [60.87k points +7.95%]
 Mode AVX2 multithread  [230.91k points +9.13%]
          
AVX2 mode comparison

Monothread integers operations
Model
Score
24.31k [1.66%]
24.3k [1.61%]
24.25k [1.39%]
24.14k [0.96%]
Intel Engineering Sample 506E8
23.91k
This model
23.6k [-1.33%]
23.31k [-2.53%]
23.28k [-2.65%]
23.27k [-2.69%]
23.26k [-2.72%]

Multithread integers operations
Model
Score
102.74k [7.81%]
101.78k [6.80%]
101.48k [6.49%]
96.43k [1.19%]
96.34k [1.10%]
Intel Engineering Sample 506E8
95.3k
This model
94.68k [-0.65%]
94.49k [-0.84%]
94.23k [-1.12%]
93.58k [-1.81%]
93.11k [-2.30%]

Monothread floating point operations
Model
Score
21.35k [1.53%]
21.15k [0.57%]
21.13k [0.47%]
Intel Engineering Sample 506E8
21.03k
This model
20.95k [-0.40%]
20.8k [-1.07%]
20.76k [-1.27%]
20.7k [-1.58%]
20.56k [-2.25%]

Multithread floating point operations
Model
Score
95.66k [4.04%]
95.11k [3.44%]
94.71k [3.01%]
93.33k [1.51%]
Intel Engineering Sample 506E8
91.94k
This model
89.94k [-2.17%]
89.03k [-3.17%]
88.77k [-3.45%]
87.87k [-4.43%]

Monothread generic test (Zip compression)
Model
Score
5.12k [1.49%]
5.09k [0.83%]
5.07k [0.54%]
Intel Engineering Sample 506E8
5.05k
This model
5.02k [-0.48%]
5.02k [-0.60%]
4.99k [-1.07%]
4.99k [-1.11%]

Multithread generic test (Zip compression)
Model
Score
24.28k [10.09%]
23.81k [7.93%]
22.65k [2.71%]
22.31k [1.15%]
Intel Engineering Sample 506E8
22.06k
This model
22.02k [-0.15%]
21.88k [-0.81%]
21.71k [-1.58%]
21.29k [-3.48%]

Monothread memory performance
Model
Score
6.51k [1.78%]
Intel Engineering Sample 506E8
6.4k
This model
6.38k [-0.27%]
6.34k [-0.93%]
6.32k [-1.29%]

Multithread memory performance
Model
Score
2.42k [5.12%]
2.38k [3.38%]
Intel Engineering Sample 506E8
2.3k
This model
2.23k [-3.20%]
2.17k [-5.78%]
2.05k [-10.82%]
1.77k [-22.87%]
 
 
 

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4