Engineering Sample 506E8 vs Ryzen 5 2600X
Description
The 506E8 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 2600X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 506E8 gets a score of 211.6 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600X is 1.6 times faster than the 506E8. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 506E8 gets a score of 211.6 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600X is 1.6 times faster than the 506E8. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e8
800f82
Core
Kaby Lake
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
- W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
June 2016
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
56.39k points
66.44k points
Mean multithread perf.
211.6k points
333.12k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
506E8
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
23.91k
15.75k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
21.03k
26.29k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.05k
5.91k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.4k
18.48k (x2.89)
TOTAL
56.39k
66.44k (x1.18)
Multithread
506E8
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
95.3k
94.49k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
91.94k
182.53k (x1.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.06k
45.95k (x2.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.3k
10.15k (x4.41)
TOTAL
211.6k
333.12k (x1.57)
Performance/W
506E8
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)