Engineering Sample 506E8 vs A10 9630P
Description
The 506E8 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 9630P is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 506E8 gets a score of 211.6 k points while the 9630P gets 32.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 506E8 is 6.4 times faster than the 9630P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 506E8 gets a score of 211.6 k points while the 9630P gets 32.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 506E8 is 6.4 times faster than the 9630P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e8
660f51
Core
Kaby Lake
Bristol Ridge
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
Socket FP4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
- W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x96+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
0 kB
Date
June 2016
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
56.39k points
23.7k points
Mean multithread perf.
211.6k points
32.92k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
506E8
9630P
Test#1 (Integers)
23.91k
8.52k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
21.03k
11.04k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.05k
2.36k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.4k
1.79k (x0.28)
TOTAL
56.39k
23.7k (x0.42)
Multithread
506E8
9630P
Test#1 (Integers)
95.3k
12.83k (x0.13)
Test#2 (FP)
91.94k
14.44k (x0.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.06k
3.6k (x0.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.3k
2.05k (x0.89)
TOTAL
211.6k
32.92k (x0.16)
Performance/W
506E8
9630P
Test#1 (Integers)