Engineering Sample 506E8 vs A9 9420
Description
The 506E8 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 9420 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 506E8 gets a score of 211.6 k points while the 9420 gets 46.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 506E8 is 4.6 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 506E8 gets a score of 211.6 k points while the 9420 gets 46.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 506E8 is 4.6 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e8
670f00
Core
Kaby Lake
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
Micro-BGA
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/2
TDP
- W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
0 kB
Date
June 2016
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
56.39k points
33.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
211.6k points
46.33k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
506E8
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
23.91k
11.74k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
21.03k
16.05k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.05k
3.26k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.4k
2.05k (x0.32)
TOTAL
56.39k
33.09k (x0.59)
Multithread
506E8
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
95.3k
18.57k (x0.19)
Test#2 (FP)
91.94k
20.11k (x0.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.06k
5.27k (x0.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.3k
2.38k (x1.03)
TOTAL
211.6k
46.33k (x0.22)
Performance/W
506E8
9420
Test#1 (Integers)