| | | | | | |

Result in mode FPU

Submitted by Namiga


December 13th 2017 at 11:13

from Windows 7 [6.1.7601]
 
Monothread
Multithread [4 threads]
Test#1 (Integers)
1998 points
3636 points (x 1.8)
Test#2 (FP)
4323 points
9793 points (x 2.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2920 points
6328 points (x 2.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
2335 points
2974 points (x 1.3)
TOTAL
11576 points
22731 points (x 2.0)

Screenshot
hlbm
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:
          
CPU

Testing details
Frequency (measured)
2959 MHz

Specs
Official name
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU L 640 @ 2.13GHz
CPUID
20655
Core
Calpella
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.133 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.667 GHz
Socket
BGA1288
Cores/Threads
2/4
TDP
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
Release date
January 2010
Mean monothread perf.
16.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
31.74k points
          
Computer

Testing details
BIOS brand
Hewlett-Packard
BIOS version
68CSU Ver. F.06 [08/24/2010]

Specs
Official name
Hewlett-Packard HP EliteBook 2540p
Motherboard
Hewlett-Packard 7008
Revision
KBC Version 38.31
Architecture
Socket
BGA 1288
          
Memory

Testing details
Slot#0
Slot#1
Total RAM
4 GB
Bus width
64 bits
Frequency
1333 MHz
Type
DDR3
Form factor
SODIMM

Slots 0, 1: Samsung M471B5673FH0-CF8
P/N
M471B5673FH0-CF8
Official brand
80CE
Type
Form factor
SODIMM
Stock frequency
1066 MHz
Size
2048 MB per module
Module
PC3-8500
Voltage
1,5 V
Timings
7-10
Kit
1 x 2048 MB
ECC
no
          
Performance

Monothread performance graphs
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.

Test#1 (Integers)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#2 (FP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#1 (Memory)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graphs
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.

Test#1 (Integers)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#2 (FP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#1 (Memory)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Monothread ranking
User
Model
Score
639.cobito
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5400
14052
640.krampak
Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400
14035
641.*
AMD A6 3500
13982
642.*
Intel Core i3-370M
13922
643.Rober García
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
13802
644.stefanhandberg73
AMD A6 3500
13646
645.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E7200
13468
646.*
Intel Core i7-5960X
13157
647.Namiga
Intel Celeron N3450
13110
648.cobito
Intel Pentium E5200 (R0)
13085
649.jos_shua
Intel Pentium E5200 (M0)
13078
650.Yorus
Intel Celeron J3455
12984
651.*
Intel Celeron E3300
12963
652.krampak
Intel Xeon E5606
12925
653.*
Intel Pentium P6200
12738
654.carmen_TM
Intel Core i7-720QM
12680
655.*
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600
12415
656.*
Intel Pentium Dual-Core T4500
12103
657.*
AMD A6 3600
12015
658.kynes
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400
11626
659.Namiga
Intel Core i7-640LM
11576
This one
660.krampak
Intel Xeon E5502
11337
661.krampak
Intel Xeon E5504
11201
662.*
AMD A6 7310
11170
663.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600
11151
664.*
Intel Pentium N3540
11127
665.*
Intel Core i5-450M
11094
666.NakedCOOL
AMD Athlon II 170u
11027
667.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500
10903
668.cobito
Intel Pentium N3540
10805
669.krampak
Intel Xeon E5506
10774
670.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
10726
671.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
10583
672.Yorus
Intel Celeron N2840
10445
673.*
Intel Pentium N3530
10441
674.Namiga
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400
10344
675.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
10332
676.*
Intel Celeron N2840
10272
677.*
Intel Celeron N3060
10147
678.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400
10106
679.*
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700
10046

Multithread ranking
User
Model
Score
649.hAyO
Intel Pentium E5500
28214
650.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
28019
651.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
27976
652.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
27923
653.*
AMD A4 6300B
27536
654.*
Intel Core i5-450M
27371
655.krampak
AMD A6 9210
27129
656.*
Intel Celeron G530
26951
657.cobito
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5400
26795
658.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
25965
659.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
25760
660.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E7200
25238
661.cobito
Intel Pentium E5200 (R0)
24907
662.*
AMD A4 5000
24707
663.*
Intel Celeron E3300
24695
664.Namiga
Intel Celeron 3855U
24556
665.mdigerat
Intel Core P9400
23315
666.*
Intel Pentium Dual-Core T4500
23050
667.Namiga
Intel Core i7-720QM
22949
668.*
Intel Pentium P6200
22910
669.Namiga
Intel Core i7-640LM
22731
This one
670.Rober García
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
22360
671.krampak
Intel Xeon E5502
22279
672.jos_shua
Intel Pentium E5200 (M0)
22021
673.*
Intel Core i3-2367M
21517
674.kynes
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400
21502
675.*
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600
20994
676.PEDRO CEPEDA
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
20833
677.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600
20628
678.krampak
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
20580
679.*
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700
19774
680.Namiga
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400
19076
681.Yorus
Intel Celeron N2840
18897
682.cobito
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
18237
683.*
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
18191
684.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400
18006
685.danipro23
AMD Athlon II M300
17727
686.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
17293
687.cobito
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
17146
688.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
17038
689.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E4500
16985

Signatures and results

If you want customized signatures for your site, forum, community, etc, contact us. It's free!

Official style

signature
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:

Ranking style

signature
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4