| | | | | | |

Result in mode SSE

Submitted anonymously


June 26th 2022 at 06:51

from Windows 10 (21H2) [10.0.19044.1766]
 
Monothread
Multithread [2 threads]
Test#1 (Integers)
5065 points
6651 points (x 1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
7613 points
10559 points (x 1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2724 points
3697 points (x 1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
1669 points
1751 points (x 1.0)
TOTAL
17071 points
22658 points (x 1.3)

Screenshot
hlbm
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:
          
CPU

Testing details
Frequency (measured)
2699 MHz

Specs
Official name
Intel(R) Celeron(R) N4020 CPU @ 1.10GHz
CPUID
706a8
Core
Gemini Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
2/2
TDP
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x24 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
Release date
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
17.88k points
Mean multithread perf.
26.91k points
          
Computer

Testing details
BIOS brand
LENOVO
BIOS version
DWCN23WW [12/10/2021]

Specs
Official name
LENOVO 81VU IdeaPad 1 14IGL05
Motherboard
LENOVO LNVNB161216
Revision
SDK0T76445 WIN
Architecture
Socket
BGA 1090
Memory FF
Row Of Chips
Memory type
DDR4
          
Memory

Testing details
Slot#0
Samsung N/A (4096 MB)
Total RAM
4 GB
Bus width
8 bits
Frequency
2400 MHz
Type
DDR4
Form factor
Row Of Chips

Slot 0: Samsung N/A
P/N
Official brand
Samsung
Type
Form factor
Row Of Chips
Stock frequency
2400 MHz
Size
4096 MB per module
          
Performance

Monothread performance graphs
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.

Test#1 (Integers)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#2 (FP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#1 (Memory)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graphs
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.

Test#1 (Integers)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#2 (FP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#1 (Memory)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Monothread ranking
User
Model
Score
585.*
Intel Xeon E5-4640
18575
586.cobito
Intel Celeron J4105
18567
587._Neptunno_
AMD Phenom II X6 1035T
18477
588.*
Intel Xeon W3530
18402
589.*
Intel Core i3-540
18274
590.Nemo
Intel Core i7-860
18229
591.suckdontblow
Intel Celeron N4020
18149
592.*
Intel Core i7-870
18133
593.*
Intel Celeron G530
18098
594.*
Intel Core i7-930
18088
595.*
Intel Xeon W3520
17960
596.jordiqui
Intel Xeon E5-2651 v2
17794
597.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
17401
598.garfield
Intel Core i5-2467M
17306
599.*
Intel Pentium N5000
17270
600.*
Intel Celeron N4100
17214
601.Namiga
Intel Core i7-640LM
17195
602.*
AMD Athlon II X2 260
17135
603.*
AMD A10 5745M
17077
604.krampak
Intel Core i7-930
17072
605.*
Intel Celeron N4020
17071
This one
606.desvest
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
16799
607.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
16780
608.*
Intel Core i5-520M
16719
609.cobito
Intel Xeon E5472
16663
610.*
Intel Xeon E5472
16592
611.*
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
16526
612.*
Intel Core i5-460 M
16316
613.Namiga
Intel Core i3-3217U
16147
614.*
Intel Pentium E6600
16142
615.*
Intel Core i3-3217U
16043
616.mdigerat
Intel Core i5-520M
15941
617.*
Intel Core i5-520M
15928
618.Namiga
Intel Xeon X3430
15839
619.cobito
Intel Core i7-720QM
15819
620.Namiga
Intel Xeon E5645
15636
621.Yorus
Intel Xeon L5430
15624
622.hAyO
Intel Pentium E5500
15352
623.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
15062
624.*
Intel Core i5-M 540
15045
625.hAyO
Intel Core i5-450M
14774

Multithread ranking
User
Model
Score
638.hAyO
Intel Pentium E5500
28214
639.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
28019
640.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
27976
641.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
27923
642.*
AMD A4 6300B
27536
643.*
Intel Core i5-450M
27371
644.krampak
AMD A6 9210
27129
645.*
Intel Celeron G530
26951
646.cobito
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5400
26795
647.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
25965
648.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
25760
649.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E7200
25238
650.cobito
Intel Pentium E5200 (R0)
24907
651.*
AMD A4 5000
24707
652.*
Intel Celeron E3300
24695
653.Namiga
Intel Celeron 3855U
24556
654.mdigerat
Intel Core P9400
23315
655.*
Intel Pentium Dual-Core T4500
23050
656.Namiga
Intel Core i7-720QM
22949
657.*
Intel Pentium P6200
22910
658.*
Intel Celeron N4020
22658
This one
659.Rober García
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
22360
660.krampak
Intel Xeon E5502
22279
661.jos_shua
Intel Pentium E5200 (M0)
22021
662.*
Intel Core i3-2367M
21517
663.kynes
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400
21502
664.PEDRO CEPEDA
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
20833
665.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600
20628
666.krampak
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
20580
667.*
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700
19774
668.Namiga
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400
19076
669.Yorus
Intel Celeron N2840
18897
670.cobito
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
18237
671.*
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
18191
672.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400
18006
673.danipro23
AMD Athlon II M300
17727
674.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
17293
675.cobito
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
17146
676.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
17038
677.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E4500
16985
678.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
16871

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4