| | | | | | |

Result in mode SSE

Submitted anonymously


June 26th 2022 at 06:51

from Windows 10 (21H2) [10.0.19044.1766]
 
Monothread
Multithread [2 threads]
Test#1 (Integers)
5065 points
6651 points (x 1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
7613 points
10559 points (x 1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2724 points
3697 points (x 1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
1669 points
1751 points (x 1.0)
TOTAL
17071 points
22658 points (x 1.3)

Screenshot
hlbm
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:
          
CPU

Testing details
Frequency (measured)
2699 MHz

Specs
Official name
Intel(R) Celeron(R) N4020 CPU @ 1.10GHz
CPUID
706a8
Core
Gemini Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
2/2
TDP
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x24 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
Release date
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
16.8k points
Mean multithread perf.
22.5k points
          
Computer

Testing details
BIOS brand
LENOVO
BIOS version
DWCN23WW [12/10/2021]

Specs
Official name
LENOVO 81VU IdeaPad 1 14IGL05
Motherboard
LENOVO LNVNB161216
Revision
SDK0T76445 WIN
Architecture
Socket
BGA 1090
Memory FF
Row Of Chips
Memory type
DDR4
          
Memory

Testing details
Slot#0
Samsung N/A (4096 MB)
Total RAM
4 GB
Bus width
8 bits
Frequency
2400 MHz
Type
DDR4
Form factor
Row Of Chips

Slot 0: Samsung N/A
P/N
Official brand
Samsung
Type
Form factor
Row Of Chips
Stock frequency
2400 MHz
Size
4096 MB per module
          
Performance

Monothread performance graphs
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.

Test#1 (Integers)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#2 (FP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#1 (Memory)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graphs
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.

Test#1 (Integers)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#2 (FP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#1 (Memory)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Monothread ranking
User
Model
Score
727.*
AMD Athlon II X4 620
18385
728.*
Intel Core i3-540
18274
729.Nemo
Intel Core i7-860
18229
730.*
Intel Pentium B980
18201
731.suckdontblow
Intel Celeron N4020
18149
732.*
Intel Core i7-870
18133
733.*
Intel Celeron G530
18098
734.*
Intel Core i7-930
18088
735.*
Intel Xeon W3520
17960
736.jordiqui
Intel Xeon E5-2651 v2
17794
737.*
AMD A8 6600K
17602
738.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
17401
739.*
Intel Core i5-560M
17323
740.garfield
Intel Core i5-2467M
17306
741.*
Intel Pentium N5000
17270
742.*
Intel Celeron N4100
17214
743.Namiga
Intel Core i7-640LM
17195
744.*
AMD Athlon II X2 260
17135
745.*
AMD A10 5745M
17077
746.krampak
Intel Core i7-930
17072
747.*
Intel Celeron N4020
17071
This one
748.desvest
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
16799
749.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
16780
750.*
Intel Core i5-520M
16719
751.cobito
Intel Xeon E5472
16663
752.*
Intel Xeon E5472
16592
753.*
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
16526
754.*
Intel Core i5-460 M
16316
755.Namiga
Intel Core i3-3217U
16147
756.*
Intel Pentium E6600
16142
757.*
Intel Core i3-3217U
16043
758.mdigerat
Intel Core i5-520M
15941
759.*
Intel Core i5-520M
15928
760.Namiga
Intel Xeon X3430
15839
761.cobito
Intel Core i7-720QM
15819
762.Namiga
Intel Xeon E5645
15636
763.Yorus
Intel Xeon L5430
15624
764.hAyO
Intel Pentium E5500
15352
765.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
15062
766.*
Intel Core i5-M 540
15045
767.hAyO
Intel Core i5-450M
14774

Multithread ranking
User
Model
Score
788.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
28019
789.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
27976
790.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
27923
791.*
AMD A4 6300B
27536
792.*
Intel Core i5-450M
27371
793.krampak
AMD A6 9210
27129
794.*
Intel Celeron G530
26951
795.cobito
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5400
26795
796.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
25965
797.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
25760
798.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E7200
25238
799.cobito
Intel Pentium E5200 (R0)
24907
800.*
AMD A4 5000
24707
801.*
Intel Celeron E3300
24695
802.Namiga
Intel Celeron 3855U
24556
803.Namiga
AMD A4 Series 3300
24240
804.mdigerat
Intel Core P9400
23315
805.*
Intel Pentium Dual-Core T4500
23050
806.Namiga
Intel Core i7-720QM
22949
807.*
Intel Pentium P6200
22910
808.*
Intel Celeron N4020
22658
This one
809.Rober García
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
22360
810.krampak
Intel Xeon E5502
22279
811.jos_shua
Intel Pentium E5200 (M0)
22021
812.*
Intel Core i3-2367M
21517
813.kynes
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400
21502
814.*
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600
20994
815.PEDRO CEPEDA
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
20833
816.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600
20628
817.krampak
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
20580
818.*
Intel Core i3-3240
20503
819.*
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700
19774
820.Namiga
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400
19076
821.Yorus
Intel Celeron N2840
18897
822.cobito
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
18237
823.*
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
18191
824.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400
18006
825.danipro23
AMD Athlon II M300
17727
826.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
17293
827.cobito
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
17146
828.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
17038

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4