| | | | | | |

Result in mode SSE

Submitted by Namiga


December 13th 2017 at 11:21

from Windows 7 [6.1.7601]
 
Monothread
Multithread [4 threads]
Test#1 (Integers)
7322 points
13331 points (x 1.8)
Test#2 (FP)
4848 points
10399 points (x 2.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2813 points
6481 points (x 2.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
2298 points
2946 points (x 1.3)
TOTAL
17281 points
33157 points (x 1.9)

Screenshot
hlbm
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:
          
CPU

Testing details
Frequency (measured)
2851 MHz

Specs
Official name
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU L 640 @ 2.13GHz
CPUID
20655
Core
Calpella
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.133 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.667 GHz
Socket
BGA1288
Cores/Threads
2/4
TDP
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
Release date
January 2010
Mean monothread perf.
16.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
31.74k points
          
Computer

Testing details
BIOS brand
Hewlett-Packard
BIOS version
68CSU Ver. F.06 [08/24/2010]

Specs
Official name
Hewlett-Packard HP EliteBook 2540p
Motherboard
Hewlett-Packard 7008
Revision
KBC Version 38.31
Architecture
Socket
BGA 1288
          
Memory

Testing details
Slot#0
Slot#1
Total RAM
4 GB
Bus width
64 bits
Frequency
1333 MHz
Type
DDR3
Form factor
SODIMM

Slots 0, 1: Samsung M471B5673FH0-CF8
P/N
M471B5673FH0-CF8
Official brand
80CE
Type
Form factor
SODIMM
Stock frequency
1066 MHz
Size
2048 MB per module
Module
PC3-8500
Voltage
1,5 V
Timings
7-10
Kit
1 x 2048 MB
ECC
no
          
Performance

Monothread performance graphs
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.

Test#1 (Integers)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#2 (FP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#1 (Memory)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graphs
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.

Test#1 (Integers)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#2 (FP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#1 (Memory)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Monothread ranking
User
Model
Score
641.*
Intel Celeron N4020
18726
642.*
Intel Core i3-550
18664
643.*
Intel Xeon E5-4640
18575
644.cobito
Intel Celeron J4105
18567
645._Neptunno_
AMD Phenom II X6 1035T
18477
646.tiago222
Intel Xeon E5-4640
18417
647.*
Intel Xeon W3530
18402
648.*
Intel Core i3-540
18274
649.Nemo
Intel Core i7-860
18229
650.*
Intel Pentium B980
18201
651.suckdontblow
Intel Celeron N4020
18149
652.*
Intel Core i7-870
18133
653.*
Intel Celeron G530
18098
654.*
Intel Core i7-930
18088
655.*
Intel Xeon W3520
17960
656.jordiqui
Intel Xeon E5-2651 v2
17794
657.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
17401
658.*
Intel Pentium Silver N6000
17380
659.*
Intel Core i5-560M
17323
660.garfield
Intel Core i5-2467M
17306
661.Namiga
Intel Core i7-640LM
17281
This one
662.*
Intel Celeron N4100
17214
663.Namiga
Intel Core i7-640LM
17195
664.*
AMD Athlon II X2 260
17135
665.*
AMD A10 5745M
17077
666.krampak
Intel Core i7-930
17072
667.*
Intel Core i3-2330M
17005
668.desvest
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
16799
669.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
16780
670.*
Intel Core i5-520M
16719
671.cobito
Intel Xeon E5472
16663
672.*
Intel Xeon E5472
16592
673.*
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
16526
674.*
Intel Core i5-460 M
16316
675.Namiga
Intel Core i3-3217U
16147
676.*
Intel Pentium E6600
16142
677.*
Intel Core i3-3217U
16043
678.mdigerat
Intel Core i5-520M
15941
679.*
Intel Core i5-520M
15928
680.Namiga
Intel Xeon X3430
15839
681.cobito
Intel Core i7-720QM
15819

Multithread ranking
User
Model
Score
665.krampak
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5
37884
666.*
Intel Core i3-550
37781
667.*
Intel Celeron 4205U
37612
668.*
AMD A10 5745M
37110
669.*
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
37000
670.*
Intel Core i3-3217U
36484
671.*
AMD A6 3500
36015
672.*
AMD A6 7310
35868
673.*
Intel Pentium G645
35385
674.Namiga
Intel Core i3-3217U
35142
675.*
Intel Core i5-560M
34990
676.*
Intel Pentium N3530
34569
677.*
Intel Pentium J2900
34351
678.*
AMD A6 7400K
34281
679.*
Intel Core i5-460 M
33685
680.*
Intel Core i5-520M
33681
681.*
Intel Celeron J1900
33560
682.*
Intel Celeron N4020
33352
683.*
Intel Celeron N3150
33332
684.*
Intel Core i5-520M
33329
685.Namiga
Intel Core i7-640LM
33157
This one
686.*
AMD A10 9630P
32919
687.*
Intel Pentium B980
32880
688.garfield
Intel Core i5-2467M
32789
689.stefanhandberg73
AMD A6 3500
32717
690.mdigerat
Intel Core i5-520M
32602
691.*
AMD Athlon II X2 260
31607
692.cobito
Intel Celeron N3150
31512
693.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E8500
31214
694.Calbertoem
Intel Core i7-870
31158
695.suckdontblow
Intel Celeron N4020
31068
696.hAyO
Intel Core i5-450M
30825
697.*
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
30640
698.*
Intel Core i5-3437U
30456
699.Yorus
AMD Athlon 5150 APU
30064
700.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
29795
701.*
Intel Core i3-370M
29601
702.*
Intel Core i5-M 540
29536
703.*
Intel Pentium E6600
29403
704.*
AMD A6 9220e
29390
705.hAyO
Intel Pentium E5500
28214

Signatures and results

If you want customized signatures for your site, forum, community, etc, contact us. It's free!

Official style

signature
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:

Ranking style

signature
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4