| | | | | | |

Result in mode SSE

Submitted by Namiga


June 05th 2018 at 17:51

from Windows 7 [6.1.7601]
 
Monothread
Multithread [8 threads]
Test#1 (Integers)
2365 points
8686 points (x 3.7)
Test#2 (FP)
1578 points
6886 points (x 4.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
885 points
4275 points (x 4.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
1193 points
3053 points (x 2.6)
TOTAL
6021 points
22900 points (x 3.8)

Screenshot
hlbm
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:
          
CPU

Testing details
Frequency (measured)
936 MHz

Specs
Official name
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU Q 720 @ 1.60GHz
CPUID
106e5
Core
Clarksfield
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
Socket
988-pin micro-FCPGA8
Cores/Threads
4/8
TDP
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
Release date
September 2009
Mean monothread perf.
13.13k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.78k points
          
Motherboard

Testing details
Model
1522
BIOS brand
Hewlett-Packard
BIOS version
F.17 [12/27/2009]
          
Memory

Testing details
Slot#0
Slot#1
Slot#2
Total RAM
6 GB
Bus width
64 bits
Frequency
1067 MHz
Type
DDR3
Form factor
SODIMM

Slots 0, 1, 2: Samsung M471B5673FH0-CF8
P/N
M471B5673FH0-CF8
Official brand
80CE
Type
Form factor
SODIMM
Stock frequency
1066 MHz
Size
2048 MB per module
Module
PC3-8500
Voltage
1,5 V
Timings
7-10
Kit
1 x 2048 MB
ECC
no
          
Performance

Monothread performance graphs
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.

Test#1 (Integers)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#2 (FP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#1 (Memory)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graphs
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.

Test#1 (Integers)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#2 (FP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#1 (Memory)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Monothread ranking
User
Model
Score
777.Namiga
Intel Celeron M 575
7275
778.cobito
Intel Celeron D 335
7174
779.krampak
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
7060
780.Fassou
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100
7048
781.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E4300
7040
782.*
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300
7037
783.*
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2160
7008
784.cobito
Intel Celeron D 331
6851
785.*
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500
6744
786.*
AMD E1 2500
6645
787.kynes
Intel Core Duo T2450
6599
788.cobito
Intel Celeron D 326
6538
789.*
AMD E2 Series 3800
6521
790.krampak
AMD E Series E-450
6512
791.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500
6421
792.kwankahung
AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
6282
793.cobito
Intel Celeron 420
6267
794.Namiga
AMD E Series E-350
6262
795.*
Intel Celeron D 331
6195
796.Hin
Intel Core i3-370M
6106
797.Namiga
Intel Core i7-720QM
6021
This one
798.kynes
Intel Core Duo T2300
5584
799.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T5270
5281
800.*
AMD C Series C-60
5213
801.cobito
AMD C Series C-60
5101
802.*
Intel Atom N450
3858
803.cobito
Intel Atom N450
3822
804.*
Intel Atom N270
3419
805.cobito
Intel Atom Z520
2983
806.Namiga
Intel Atom N450
2877
807.*
Intel Atom Z520
1881
808.cobito
Intel Mobile Pentium II PE 333
797
809.cobito
Intel i486DX4 75
33
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Multithread ranking
User
Model
Score
705.hAyO
Intel Pentium E5500
28214
706.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
28019
707.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
27976
708.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
27923
709.*
AMD A4 6300B
27536
710.*
Intel Core i5-450M
27371
711.krampak
AMD A6 9210
27129
712.*
Intel Celeron G530
26951
713.cobito
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5400
26795
714.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
25965
715.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
25760
716.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E7200
25238
717.cobito
Intel Pentium E5200 (R0)
24907
718.*
AMD A4 5000
24707
719.*
Intel Celeron E3300
24695
720.Namiga
Intel Celeron 3855U
24556
721.mdigerat
Intel Core P9400
23315
722.*
Intel Pentium Dual-Core T4500
23050
723.Namiga
Intel Core i7-720QM
22949
724.*
Intel Pentium P6200
22910
725.Namiga
Intel Core i7-720QM
22900
This one
726.Rober García
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
22360
727.krampak
Intel Xeon E5502
22279
728.jos_shua
Intel Pentium E5200 (M0)
22021
729.*
Intel Core i3-2367M
21517
730.kynes
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400
21502
731.*
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600
20994
732.PEDRO CEPEDA
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
20833
733.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600
20628
734.krampak
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
20580
735.*
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700
19774
736.Namiga
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400
19076
737.Yorus
Intel Celeron N2840
18897
738.cobito
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
18237
739.*
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
18191
740.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400
18006
741.danipro23
AMD Athlon II M300
17727
742.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
17293
743.cobito
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
17146
744.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
17038
745.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E4500
16985

Signatures and results

If you want customized signatures for your site, forum, community, etc, contact us. It's free!

Official style

signature
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:

Ranking style

signature
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4