| | | | | | |

Result in mode SSE

Submitted by Namiga


June 05th 2018 at 17:51

from Windows 7 [6.1.7601]
 
Monothread
Multithread [8 threads]
Test#1 (Integers)
2365 points
8686 points (x 3.7)
Test#2 (FP)
1578 points
6886 points (x 4.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
885 points
4275 points (x 4.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
1193 points
3053 points (x 2.6)
TOTAL
6021 points
22900 points (x 3.8)

Screenshot
hlbm
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:
          
CPU

Testing details
Frequency (measured)
936 MHz

Specs
Official name
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU Q 720 @ 1.60GHz
CPUID
106e5
Core
Clarksfield
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
Socket
988-pin micro-FCPGA8
Cores/Threads
4/8
TDP
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
Release date
September 2009
Mean monothread perf.
13.13k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.78k points
          
Motherboard

Testing details
Model
1522
BIOS brand
Hewlett-Packard
BIOS version
F.17 [12/27/2009]
          
Memory

Testing details
Slot#0
Slot#1
Slot#2
Total RAM
6 GB
Bus width
64 bits
Frequency
1067 MHz
Type
DDR3
Form factor
SODIMM

Slots 0, 1, 2: Samsung M471B5673FH0-CF8
P/N
M471B5673FH0-CF8
Official brand
80CE
Type
Form factor
SODIMM
Stock frequency
1066 MHz
Size
2048 MB per module
Module
PC3-8500
Voltage
1,5 V
Timings
7-10
Kit
1 x 2048 MB
ECC
no
          
Performance

Monothread performance graphs
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.

Test#1 (Integers)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#2 (FP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#1 (Memory)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graphs
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.

Test#1 (Integers)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#2 (FP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#1 (Memory)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Monothread ranking
User
Model
Score
860.Namiga
Intel Celeron M 575
7275
861.cobito
Intel Celeron D 335
7174
862.krampak
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
7060
863.Fassou
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100
7048
864.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E4300
7040
865.*
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300
7037
866.*
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2160
7008
867.cobito
Intel Celeron D 331
6851
868.*
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500
6744
869.*
AMD E1 2500
6645
870.kynes
Intel Core Duo T2450
6599
871.cobito
Intel Celeron D 326
6538
872.*
AMD E2 Series 3800
6521
873.krampak
AMD E Series E-450
6512
874.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500
6421
875.kwankahung
AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
6282
876.cobito
Intel Celeron 420
6267
877.Namiga
AMD E Series E-350
6262
878.*
Intel Celeron D 331
6195
879.Hin
Intel Core i3-370M
6106
880.Namiga
Intel Core i7-720QM
6021
This one
881.kynes
Intel Core Duo T2300
5584
882.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T5270
5281
883.*
AMD E-Series E-300
5224
884.*
AMD C Series C-60
5213
885.cobito
AMD C Series C-60
5101
886.*
Intel Atom N450
3858
887.cobito
Intel Atom N450
3822
888.*
Intel Atom N270
3419
889.*
Intel Atom N2600
3290
890.cobito
Intel Atom Z520
2983
891.Namiga
Intel Atom N450
2877
892.*
Intel Atom Z520
1881
893.cobito
Intel Mobile Pentium II PE 333
797
894.cobito
Intel i486DX4 75
33
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Multithread ranking
User
Model
Score
786.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
28019
787.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
27976
788.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
27923
789.*
AMD A4 6300B
27536
790.*
Intel Core i5-450M
27371
791.krampak
AMD A6 9210
27129
792.*
Intel Celeron G530
26951
793.cobito
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5400
26795
794.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
25965
795.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
25760
796.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E7200
25238
797.cobito
Intel Pentium E5200 (R0)
24907
798.*
AMD A4 5000
24707
799.*
Intel Celeron E3300
24695
800.Namiga
Intel Celeron 3855U
24556
801.Namiga
AMD A4 Series 3300
24240
802.mdigerat
Intel Core P9400
23315
803.*
Intel Pentium Dual-Core T4500
23050
804.Namiga
Intel Core i7-720QM
22949
805.*
Intel Pentium P6200
22910
806.Namiga
Intel Core i7-720QM
22900
This one
807.Rober García
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
22360
808.krampak
Intel Xeon E5502
22279
809.jos_shua
Intel Pentium E5200 (M0)
22021
810.*
Intel Core i3-2367M
21517
811.kynes
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400
21502
812.*
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600
20994
813.PEDRO CEPEDA
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
20833
814.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600
20628
815.krampak
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
20580
816.*
Intel Core i3-3240
20503
817.*
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700
19774
818.Namiga
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400
19076
819.Yorus
Intel Celeron N2840
18897
820.cobito
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
18237
821.*
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
18191
822.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400
18006
823.danipro23
AMD Athlon II M300
17727
824.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
17293
825.cobito
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
17146
826.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
17038

Signatures and results

If you want customized signatures for your site, forum, community, etc, contact us. It's free!

Official style

signature
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:

Ranking style

signature
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4