| | | | | | |

Result in mode SSE

Submitted by mdigerat


January 02nd 2021 at 14:27

from Windows [10.0.20279.1]
 
Monothread
Multithread [2 threads]
Test#1 (Integers)
2760 points
5295 points (x 1.9)
Test#2 (FP)
6185 points
11645 points (x 1.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2438 points
4511 points (x 1.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
3312 points
1941 points (x 0.6)
TOTAL
14695 points
23392 points (x 1.6)

Screenshot
hlbm
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:
          
CPU

Testing details
Frequency (measured)
2576 MHz

Specs
Official name
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU P9400 @ 2.40GHz
CPUID
1067a
Core
Penryn-3M
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
Socket
FC-PGA 478
Cores/Threads
2/2
TDP
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6144 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
Release date
April 2009
          
Computer

Testing details
BIOS brand
Dell Inc.
BIOS version
A07 [05/07/2009]

Specs
Official name
Dell Inc. Latitude E4300 Not Specified
Motherboard
Dell Inc. 0D201R
Revision
Architecture
Socket
PGA 978
          
Memory

Testing details
Slot#0
Slot#1
Total RAM
2 GB
Bus width
64 bits
Frequency
1066 MHz
Type
DDR3
Form factor
DIMM

Slots 0, 1: Crucial CT102464BF160B
P/N
CT102464BF160B.M16
Official brand
Unknown
Type
Form factor
SODIMM
Stock frequency
1600 MHz
Size
8192 MB per module
Module
PC3-12800
Voltage
1,35 V
Timings
11-11-11
Kit
1 x 8192 MB
ECC
no
          
Performance

Monothread performance graphs
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.

Test#1 (Integers)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#2 (FP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#1 (Memory)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graphs
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.

Test#1 (Integers)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#2 (FP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#1 (Memory)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Monothread ranking
User
Model
Score
782.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
16780
783.*
Intel Core i5-520M
16719
784.cobito
Intel Xeon E5472
16663
785.*
Intel Xeon E5472
16592
786.*
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
16526
787.*
Intel Core i5-460 M
16316
788.*
Intel Core i3-2328M
16173
789.Namiga
Intel Core i3-3217U
16147
790.*
Intel Pentium E6600
16142
791.*
Intel Core i3-3217U
16043
792.mdigerat
Intel Core i5-520M
15941
793.*
Intel Core i5-520M
15928
794.Namiga
Intel Xeon X3430
15839
795.cobito
Intel Core i7-720QM
15819
796.Namiga
Intel Xeon E5645
15636
797.Yorus
Intel Xeon L5430
15624
798.hAyO
Intel Pentium E5500
15352
799.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
15062
800.*
Intel Core i5-M 540
15045
801.hAyO
Intel Core i5-450M
14774
802.mdigerat
Intel Core P9400
14695
This one
803.*
Intel Core i5-3437U
14649
804.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
14270
805.Calbertoem
Intel Core i7-870
14270
806.cobito
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5400
14052
807.krampak
Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400
14035
808.*
AMD A6 3500
13982
809.*
Intel Core i3-370M
13922
810.cobito
Intel Celeron J3455
13901
811.*
Intel Celeron J3455
13900
812.Rober García
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
13802
813.Namiga
AMD A4 Series 3300
13765
814.stefanhandberg73
AMD A6 3500
13646
815.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E7200
13468
816.*
Intel Core i7-5960X
13157
817.Namiga
Intel Celeron N3450
13110
818.cobito
Intel Pentium E5200 (R0)
13085
819.jos_shua
Intel Pentium E5200 (M0)
13078
820.Yorus
Intel Celeron J3455
12984
821.*
Intel Celeron E3300
12963
822.krampak
Intel Xeon E5606
12925

Multithread ranking
User
Model
Score
818.hAyO
Intel Pentium E5500
28214
819.*
AMD A6 6310
28189
820.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
28019
821.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
27976
822.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
27923
823.*
AMD A4 6300B
27536
824.*
Intel Core i5-450M
27371
825.krampak
AMD A6 9210
27129
826.*
Intel Celeron G530
26951
827.cobito
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5400
26795
828.*
Intel Pentium B960
26310
829.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
25965
830.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
25760
831.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E7200
25238
832.cobito
Intel Pentium E5200 (R0)
24907
833.*
AMD A4 5000
24707
834.*
Intel Celeron E3300
24695
835.Namiga
Intel Celeron 3855U
24556
836.Namiga
AMD A4 Series 3300
24240
837.*
Intel Core E8235
24022
838.mdigerat
Intel Core P9400
23392
This one
839.*
Intel Pentium Dual-Core T4500
23050
840.Namiga
Intel Core i7-720QM
22949
841.*
Intel Pentium P6200
22910
842.*
AMD E2 Series 3800
22518
843.Rober García
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
22360
844.krampak
Intel Xeon E5502
22279
845.jos_shua
Intel Pentium E5200 (M0)
22021
846.*
Intel Core i3-2367M
21517
847.kynes
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400
21502
848.*
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600
20994
849.PEDRO CEPEDA
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
20833
850.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600
20628
851.krampak
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
20580
852.*
Intel Core i3-3240
20503
853.*
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700
19774
854.Namiga
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400
19076
855.Yorus
Intel Celeron N2840
18897
856.cobito
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
18237
857.*
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
18191
858.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400
18006

Signatures and results

If you want customized signatures for your site, forum, community, etc, contact us. It's free!

Official style

signature
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:

Ranking style

signature
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4