| | | | | | |

Result in mode SSE

Submitted by mdigerat


January 02nd 2021 at 14:27

from Windows [10.0.20279.1]
 
Monothread
Multithread [2 threads]
Test#1 (Integers)
2760 points
5295 points (x 1.9)
Test#2 (FP)
6185 points
11645 points (x 1.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2438 points
4511 points (x 1.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
3312 points
1941 points (x 0.6)
TOTAL
14695 points
23392 points (x 1.6)

Screenshot
hlbm
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:
          
CPU

Testing details
Frequency (measured)
2576 MHz

Specs
Official name
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU P9400 @ 2.40GHz
CPUID
1067a
Core
Penryn-3M
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
Socket
FC-PGA 478
Cores/Threads
2/2
TDP
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6144 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
Release date
April 2009
          
Computer

Testing details
BIOS brand
Dell Inc.
BIOS version
A07 [05/07/2009]

Specs
Official name
Dell Inc. Latitude E4300 Not Specified
Motherboard
Dell Inc. 0D201R
Revision
Architecture
Socket
PGA 978
          
Memory

Testing details
Slot#0
Slot#1
Total RAM
2 GB
Bus width
64 bits
Frequency
1066 MHz
Type
DDR3
Form factor
DIMM

Slots 0, 1: Crucial CT102464BF160B
P/N
CT102464BF160B.M16
Official brand
Unknown
Type
Form factor
SODIMM
Stock frequency
1600 MHz
Size
8192 MB per module
Module
PC3-12800
Voltage
1,35 V
Timings
11-11-11
Kit
1 x 8192 MB
ECC
no
          
Performance

Monothread performance graphs
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.

Test#1 (Integers)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#2 (FP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#1 (Memory)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graphs
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.

Test#1 (Integers)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#2 (FP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#1 (Memory)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Monothread ranking
User
Model
Score
668.desvest
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
16799
669.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
16780
670.*
Intel Core i5-520M
16719
671.cobito
Intel Xeon E5472
16663
672.*
Intel Xeon E5472
16592
673.*
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
16526
674.*
Intel Core i5-460 M
16316
675.Namiga
Intel Core i3-3217U
16147
676.*
Intel Pentium E6600
16142
677.*
Intel Core i3-3217U
16043
678.mdigerat
Intel Core i5-520M
15941
679.*
Intel Core i5-520M
15928
680.Namiga
Intel Xeon X3430
15839
681.cobito
Intel Core i7-720QM
15819
682.Namiga
Intel Xeon E5645
15636
683.Yorus
Intel Xeon L5430
15624
684.hAyO
Intel Pentium E5500
15352
685.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
15062
686.*
Intel Core i5-M 540
15045
687.hAyO
Intel Core i5-450M
14774
688.mdigerat
Intel Core P9400
14695
This one
689.*
Intel Core i5-3437U
14649
690.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
14270
691.Calbertoem
Intel Core i7-870
14270
692.cobito
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5400
14052
693.krampak
Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400
14035
694.*
AMD A6 3500
13982
695.*
Intel Core i3-370M
13922
696.cobito
Intel Celeron J3455
13901
697.*
Intel Celeron J3455
13900
698.Rober García
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
13802
699.stefanhandberg73
AMD A6 3500
13646
700.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E7200
13468
701.*
Intel Core i7-5960X
13157
702.Namiga
Intel Celeron N3450
13110
703.cobito
Intel Pentium E5200 (R0)
13085
704.jos_shua
Intel Pentium E5200 (M0)
13078
705.Yorus
Intel Celeron J3455
12984
706.*
Intel Celeron E3300
12963
707.krampak
Intel Xeon E5606
12925
708.*
Intel Pentium P6200
12738

Multithread ranking
User
Model
Score
701.*
Intel Core i3-370M
29601
702.*
Intel Core i5-M 540
29536
703.*
Intel Pentium E6600
29403
704.*
AMD A6 9220e
29390
705.hAyO
Intel Pentium E5500
28214
706.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
28019
707.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
27976
708.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
27923
709.*
AMD A4 6300B
27536
710.*
Intel Core i5-450M
27371
711.krampak
AMD A6 9210
27129
712.*
Intel Celeron G530
26951
713.cobito
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5400
26795
714.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
25965
715.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
25760
716.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E7200
25238
717.cobito
Intel Pentium E5200 (R0)
24907
718.*
AMD A4 5000
24707
719.*
Intel Celeron E3300
24695
720.Namiga
Intel Celeron 3855U
24556
721.mdigerat
Intel Core P9400
23392
This one
722.*
Intel Pentium Dual-Core T4500
23050
723.Namiga
Intel Core i7-720QM
22949
724.*
Intel Pentium P6200
22910
725.*
AMD E2 Series 3800
22518
726.Rober García
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
22360
727.krampak
Intel Xeon E5502
22279
728.jos_shua
Intel Pentium E5200 (M0)
22021
729.*
Intel Core i3-2367M
21517
730.kynes
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400
21502
731.*
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600
20994
732.PEDRO CEPEDA
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
20833
733.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600
20628
734.krampak
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
20580
735.*
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700
19774
736.Namiga
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400
19076
737.Yorus
Intel Celeron N2840
18897
738.cobito
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
18237
739.*
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
18191
740.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400
18006
741.danipro23
AMD Athlon II M300
17727

Signatures and results

If you want customized signatures for your site, forum, community, etc, contact us. It's free!

Official style

signature
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:

Ranking style

signature
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4