| | | | | | |

Result in mode SSE

Submitted by krampak


November 03rd 2017 at 08:35

Monothread
Multithread [2 threads]
Test#1 (Integers)
3243 points
6486 points (x 2.0)
Test#2 (FP)
7151 points
14244 points (x 2.0)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2868 points
5756 points (x 2.0)
Test#1 (Memory)
1835 points
1603 points (x 0.9)
TOTAL
15097 points
28089 points (x 1.9)

Screenshot
hlbm
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:
          
CPU

Testing details
Frequency (measured)
2837 MHz

Specs
Official name
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E7400 @ 2.80GHz
CPUID
1067a
Core
Wolfdale
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
TDP
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
Cache L2
3072 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
Release date
October 2008
Mean monothread perf.
14.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
25.71k points
          
Computer

Testing details
BIOS brand
HP
BIOS version
O15 [03/12/2009]

Specs
Official name
HP ProLiant ML110 G5 NA
Motherboard
Wistron Corporation ProLiant ML110 G5
Revision
NA
Architecture
Socket
LGA 775
          
Memory

Testing details
Slot#0
Generic N/A (2048 MB)
Slot#2
Generic N/A (2048 MB)
Total RAM
4 GB
Bus width
40968 bits
Frequency
800 MHz
Type
DDR2
Form factor
DIMM

Slots 0, 2: Generic N/A
P/N
PartNum0
Official brand
Manufacturer0
Type
Form factor
DIMM
Stock frequency
800 MHz
Size
2048 MB per module
          
Performance

Monothread performance graphs
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.

Test#1 (Integers)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#2 (FP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#1 (Memory)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graphs
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.

Test#1 (Integers)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#2 (FP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#1 (Memory)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Monothread ranking
User
Model
Score
782.*
Intel Core E8235
17003
783.*
Intel Pentium B960
16876
784.desvest
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
16799
785.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
16780
786.*
Intel Core i5-520M
16719
787.cobito
Intel Xeon E5472
16663
788.*
Intel Xeon E5472
16592
789.*
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
16526
790.*
Intel Core i5-460 M
16316
791.*
Intel Core i3-2328M
16173
792.Namiga
Intel Core i3-3217U
16147
793.*
Intel Pentium E6600
16142
794.*
Intel Core i3-3217U
16043
795.mdigerat
Intel Core i5-520M
15941
796.*
Intel Core i5-520M
15928
797.Namiga
Intel Xeon X3430
15839
798.cobito
Intel Core i7-720QM
15819
799.Namiga
Intel Xeon E5645
15636
800.Yorus
Intel Xeon L5430
15624
801.hAyO
Intel Pentium E5500
15352
802.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
15097
This one
803.*
Intel Core i5-M 540
15045
804.hAyO
Intel Core i5-450M
14774
805.mdigerat
Intel Core P9400
14659
806.*
Intel Core i5-3437U
14649
807.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
14270
808.Calbertoem
Intel Core i7-870
14270
809.cobito
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5400
14052
810.krampak
Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400
14035
811.*
AMD A6 3500
13982
812.*
Intel Core i3-370M
13922
813.cobito
Intel Celeron J3455
13901
814.*
Intel Celeron J3455
13900
815.Rober García
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
13802
816.Namiga
AMD A4 Series 3300
13765
817.stefanhandberg73
AMD A6 3500
13646
818.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E7200
13468
819.*
Intel Core i7-5960X
13157
820.Namiga
Intel Celeron N3450
13110
821.cobito
Intel Pentium E5200 (R0)
13085
822.jos_shua
Intel Pentium E5200 (M0)
13078

Multithread ranking
User
Model
Score
803.stefanhandberg73
AMD A6 3500
32717
804.mdigerat
Intel Core i5-520M
32602
805.*
AMD Athlon II X2 260
31607
806.cobito
Intel Celeron N3150
31512
807.*
AMD A8 6600K
31466
808.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E8500
31214
809.Calbertoem
Intel Core i7-870
31158
810.suckdontblow
Intel Celeron N4020
31068
811.hAyO
Intel Core i5-450M
30825
812.*
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
30640
813.Namiga
AMD Athlon 5350
30640
814.*
Intel Core i5-3437U
30456
815.Yorus
AMD Athlon 5150 APU
30064
816.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
29795
817.*
Intel Core i3-370M
29601
818.*
Intel Core i5-M 540
29536
819.*
Intel Pentium E6600
29403
820.*
AMD A6 9220e
29390
821.hAyO
Intel Pentium E5500
28214
822.*
AMD A6 6310
28189
823.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
28089
This one
824.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
27976
825.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
27923
826.*
AMD A4 6300B
27536
827.*
Intel Core i5-450M
27371
828.krampak
AMD A6 9210
27129
829.*
Intel Celeron G530
26951
830.cobito
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5400
26795
831.*
Intel Pentium B960
26310
832.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
25965
833.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
25760
834.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E7200
25238
835.cobito
Intel Pentium E5200 (R0)
24907
836.*
AMD A4 5000
24707
837.*
Intel Celeron E3300
24695
838.Namiga
Intel Celeron 3855U
24556
839.Namiga
AMD A4 Series 3300
24240
840.*
Intel Core E8235
24022
841.mdigerat
Intel Core P9400
23315
842.*
Intel Pentium Dual-Core T4500
23050
843.Namiga
Intel Core i7-720QM
22949

Signatures and results

If you want customized signatures for your site, forum, community, etc, contact us. It's free!

Official style

signature
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:

Ranking style

signature
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4