| | | | | | |

Result in mode FPU

Submitted by Namiga


April 25th 2018 at 18:35

from Windows 10 (Redstone 3 - 1709) [10.0.16299.402]
 
Monothread
Multithread [4 threads]
Test#1 (Integers)
1783 points
3595 points (x 2.0)
Test#2 (FP)
5008 points
11558 points (x 2.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points
5382 points (x 2.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
2308 points
2529 points (x 1.1)
TOTAL
11315 points
23064 points (x 2.0)

Screenshot
hlbm
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:
          
CPU

Testing details
Frequency (measured)
1819 MHz

Specs
Official name
Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-3217U CPU @ 1.80GHz
CPUID
306a9
Core
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
2 /2
TDP
17 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
Release date
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
16.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
35.81k points
          
Computer

Testing details
BIOS brand
Insyde
BIOS version
F.06 [10/23/2012]

Specs
Official name
Hewlett-Packard HP Pavilion Sleekbook 15 PC 087E1000003B5900000320100
Motherboard
Hewlett-Packard 18FE
Revision
82.13
Architecture
Socket
BGA 1023
          
Memory

Testing details
Slot#1
Total RAM
4 GB
Bus width
64 bits
Frequency
1600 MHz
Type
DDR3
Form factor
DIMM

Slot 1: ADATA AM1L16BC4R1-B1GS
P/N
AM1L16BC4R1-B1GS
Official brand
A-DATA Technology
Type
Form factor
SODIMM
Stock frequency
800 MHz
Size
4096 MB per module
Module
PC3-12800
Voltage
1,35 V
Timings
11
Kit
1 x 4096 MB
ECC
no
          
Performance

Monothread performance graphs
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.

Test#1 (Integers)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#2 (FP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#1 (Memory)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graphs
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.

Test#1 (Integers)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#2 (FP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#1 (Memory)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Monothread ranking
User
Model
Score
777.*
Intel Celeron J3455
13900
778.Rober García
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
13802
779.Namiga
AMD A4 Series 3300
13765
780.stefanhandberg73
AMD A6 3500
13646
781.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E7200
13468
782.*
Intel Core i7-5960X
13157
783.Namiga
Intel Celeron N3450
13110
784.cobito
Intel Pentium E5200 (R0)
13085
785.jos_shua
Intel Pentium E5200 (M0)
13078
786.Yorus
Intel Celeron J3455
12984
787.*
Intel Celeron E3300
12963
788.krampak
Intel Xeon E5606
12925
789.*
Intel Pentium P6200
12738
790.carmen_TM
Intel Core i7-720QM
12680
791.*
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600
12415
792.*
Intel Pentium Dual-Core T4500
12103
793.*
AMD A6 3600
12015
794.kynes
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400
11626
795.*
AMD A4 3310MX
11401
796.krampak
Intel Xeon E5502
11337
797.Namiga
Intel Core i3-3217U
11315
This one
798.*
AMD A6 7310
11170
799.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600
11151
800.*
Intel Pentium N3540
11127
801.*
Intel Core i5-450M
11094
802.NakedCOOL
AMD Athlon II 170u
11027
803.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500
10903
804.cobito
Intel Pentium N3540
10805
805.krampak
Intel Xeon E5506
10774
806.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
10726
807.*
Intel Pentium J2900
10645
808.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
10583
809.*
Intel Xeon X5365
10500
810.Yorus
Intel Celeron N2840
10445
811.*
Intel Pentium N3530
10441
812.Namiga
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400
10344
813.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
10332
814.*
Intel Celeron N2840
10272
815.*
Intel Celeron N3060
10147
816.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400
10106
817.*
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700
10046

Multithread ranking
User
Model
Score
785.*
AMD A6 9220e
29390
786.hAyO
Intel Pentium E5500
28214
787.*
AMD A6 6310
28189
788.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
28019
789.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
27976
790.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
27923
791.*
AMD A4 6300B
27536
792.*
Intel Core i5-450M
27371
793.krampak
AMD A6 9210
27129
794.*
Intel Celeron G530
26951
795.cobito
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5400
26795
796.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
25965
797.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
25760
798.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E7200
25238
799.cobito
Intel Pentium E5200 (R0)
24907
800.*
AMD A4 5000
24707
801.*
Intel Celeron E3300
24695
802.Namiga
Intel Celeron 3855U
24556
803.Namiga
AMD A4 Series 3300
24240
804.mdigerat
Intel Core P9400
23315
805.Namiga
Intel Core i3-3217U
23064
This one
806.Namiga
Intel Core i7-720QM
22949
807.*
Intel Pentium P6200
22910
808.*
AMD E2 Series 3800
22518
809.Rober García
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
22360
810.krampak
Intel Xeon E5502
22279
811.jos_shua
Intel Pentium E5200 (M0)
22021
812.*
Intel Core i3-2367M
21517
813.kynes
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400
21502
814.*
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600
20994
815.PEDRO CEPEDA
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
20833
816.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600
20628
817.krampak
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
20580
818.*
Intel Core i3-3240
20503
819.*
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700
19774
820.Namiga
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400
19076
821.Yorus
Intel Celeron N2840
18897
822.cobito
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
18237
823.*
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
18191
824.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400
18006
825.danipro23
AMD Athlon II M300
17727

Signatures and results

If you want customized signatures for your site, forum, community, etc, contact us. It's free!

Official style

signature
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:

Ranking style

signature
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4