| | | | | | |

Result in mode

Submitted by cobito


November 17th 2017 at 19:02

Monothread
Multithread [2 threads]
Test#1 (Integers)
2099 points
1845 points (x 0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
3338 points
4599 points (x 1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1574 points
1905 points (x 1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
917 points
900 points (x 1.0)
TOTAL
7928 points
9249 points (x 1.2)

Screenshot
hlbm
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:
          
CPU

Testing details
Frequency (measured)
3055 MHz

Specs
Official name
Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz
CPUID
f43
Core
Prescott
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
1/2
TDP
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16+8 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
Release date
2005
Mean monothread perf.
7.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
9.14k points
          
Motherboard

Testing details
BIOS brand
American Megatrends Inc.
BIOS version
1238 [09/30/2008]

Specs
Official name
ASUSTeK Computer INC. P5B-Deluxe
Revision
Rev 1.xx
Chipset
Intel P965
Socket
          
Memory

Testing details
Slot#0
(512 MB)
Slot#2
(512 MB)
Total RAM
1024 MB
Bus width
64 bits
Frequency
667 MHz
Type
Form factor
DIMM

Slots 0, 2:
P/N
CT51264BA160B.C16F
Official brand
859B
Type
Form factor
DIMM
Stock frequency
1600 MHz
Size
4096 MB per module
Module
PC3-12800
Voltage
1,2 V
Timings
11
Kit
1 x 4096 MB
ECC
no
          
Performance

Monothread performance graphs
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.

Test#1 (Integers)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#2 (FP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#1 (Memory)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graphs
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.

Test#1 (Integers)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#2 (FP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#1 (Memory)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Monothread ranking
User
Model
Score
860.*
Intel Celeron N3150
9345
861.cobito
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
9208
862.cobito
Intel Celeron N3150
9175
863.*
Intel Celeron T3000
9156
864.cobito
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
9055
865.*
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
8924
866.krampak
Intel Pentium D 950
8809
867.hAyO
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
8770
868.Yorus
Intel Core 2 Duo E6320
8728
869.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E4500
8338
870.*
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2200
8306
871.Yorus
AMD Athlon 5150 APU
8259
872.cobito
Intel Celeron D 352
8228
873.*
Intel Celeron D 351
8120
874.cobito
Intel Celeron D 351
8107
875.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E6320
8087
876.kynes
Intel Pentium T3400
8049
877.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 531
7955
878.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 519K
7948
879.cobito
Intel Celeron D 347
7934
880.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 630
7928
This one
881.cobito
Intel Celeron D 346
7796
882.krampak
Intel Pentium D 925
7696
883.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E4400
7672
884.*
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2180
7656
885.kynes
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250
7647
886.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 515J
7626
887.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E4400
7561
888.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 521
7484
889.cobito
Intel Celeron D 341
7481
890.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800
7469
891.cobito
Intel Pentium D 820
7464
892.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 520
7464
893.cobito
Intel Pentium D 915
7454
894.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo E6300
7385
895.*
AMD A4 5000
7376
896.Namiga
Intel Celeron M 575
7275
897.cobito
Intel Celeron D 335
7174
898.krampak
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
7060
899.Fassou
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100
7048
900.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E4300
7040

Multithread ranking
User
Model
Score
878.*
Intel Celeron N3060
13363
879.Yorus
Intel Core 2 Duo E6320
13336
880.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E6320
13152
881.Hin
Intel Core i3-370M
13080
882.krampak
Intel Pentium D 950
12987
883.kwankahung
AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
12907
884.Fassou
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100
12904
885.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E4300
12895
886.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo E6300
12887
887.*
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2160
12874
888.*
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300
12037
889.kynes
Intel Core Duo T2450
11947
890.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500
11834
891.hAyO
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
10972
892.*
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500
10649
893.Namiga
AMD E Series E-350
10048
894.krampak
AMD E Series E-450
9654
895.*
AMD E1 2500
9443
896.kynes
Intel Core Duo T2300
9380
897.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 630
9250
898.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 630
9249
This one
899.cobito
AMD C Series C-60
9214
900.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500
9168
901.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 531
9163
902.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 520
8671
903.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 521
8600
904.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T5270
8309
905.*
AMD E-Series E-300
7268
906.*
Intel Atom N450
5664
907.cobito
Intel Atom N450
4972
908.*
Intel Atom N270
4477
909.*
Intel Atom N2600
4374
910.cobito
Intel Atom Z520
3658
911.Namiga
Intel Atom N450
3401
912.*
Intel Atom Z520
2844
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Signatures and results

If you want customized signatures for your site, forum, community, etc, contact us. It's free!

Official style

signature
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:

Ranking style

signature
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4