| | | | | | |

Result in mode SSE

Submitted anonymously


December 19th 2020 at 22:30

from Windows 10 (20H1 - 2004) [10.0.19041.685]
 
Monothread
Multithread [2 threads]
Test#1 (Integers)
2411 points
1680 points (x 0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
5308 points
4436 points (x 0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2072 points
1458 points (x 0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
1141 points
1237 points (x 1.1)
TOTAL
10932 points
8811 points (x 0.8)

Screenshot
hlbm
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:
          
CPU

Testing details
Frequency (measured)
2101 MHz

Specs
Official name
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T6500 @ 2.10GHz
CPUID
1067a
Core
Penryn-3M
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.1 GHz
Socket
FC-PGA 478
Cores/Threads
2/2
TDP
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
Release date
April 2009
Mean monothread perf.
10.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
9.17k points
          
Computer

Testing details
Model
BIOS brand
Hewlett-Packard
BIOS version
F.52 [08/26/2009]

Specs
Official name
Hewlett-Packard HP G70 Notebook PC PCID
Motherboard
Wistron 360C
Revision
09.66
Architecture
Socket
PGA 478
          
Memory

Testing details
Slot#0
Unknown N/A (2048 MB)
Slot#1
Unknown N/A (2048 MB)
Total RAM
4 GB
Bus width
64 bits
Frequency
800 MHz
Type
DDR2
Form factor
SODIMM

Slots 0, 1: Unknown N/A
P/N
SODIMM000
Official brand
Mfg 0
Type
Form factor
SODIMM
Stock frequency
666 MHz
Size
2048 MB per module
          
Performance

Monothread performance graphs
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.

Test#1 (Integers)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#2 (FP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#1 (Memory)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graphs
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.

Test#1 (Integers)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#2 (FP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#1 (Memory)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Monothread ranking
User
Model
Score
768.Namiga
Intel Celeron N3450
13110
769.cobito
Intel Pentium E5200 (R0)
13085
770.jos_shua
Intel Pentium E5200 (M0)
13078
771.Yorus
Intel Celeron J3455
12984
772.*
Intel Celeron E3300
12963
773.krampak
Intel Xeon E5606
12925
774.*
Intel Pentium P6200
12738
775.carmen_TM
Intel Core i7-720QM
12680
776.*
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600
12415
777.*
Intel Pentium Dual-Core T4500
12103
778.*
AMD A6 3600
12015
779.kynes
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400
11626
780.*
AMD A4 3310MX
11401
781.krampak
Intel Xeon E5502
11337
782.krampak
Intel Xeon E5504
11201
783.*
AMD A6 7310
11170
784.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600
11151
785.*
Intel Pentium N3540
11127
786.*
Intel Core i5-450M
11094
787.NakedCOOL
AMD Athlon II 170u
11027
788.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500
10932
This one
789.cobito
Intel Pentium N3540
10805
790.krampak
Intel Xeon E5506
10774
791.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
10726
792.*
Intel Pentium J2900
10645
793.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
10583
794.*
Intel Xeon X5365
10500
795.Yorus
Intel Celeron N2840
10445
796.*
Intel Pentium N3530
10441
797.Namiga
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400
10344
798.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
10332
799.*
Intel Celeron N2840
10272
800.*
Intel Celeron N3060
10147
801.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400
10106
802.*
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700
10046
803.*
Intel Core i3-2367M
9959
804.*
Intel Celeron J1900
9783
805.*
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
9766
806.Namiga
AMD Athlon 5350
9725
807.danipro23
AMD Athlon II M300
9567
808.krampak
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5
9522

Multithread ranking
User
Model
Score
832.krampak
Intel Pentium D 950
12987
833.kwankahung
AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
12907
834.Fassou
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100
12904
835.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E4300
12895
836.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo E6300
12887
837.*
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2160
12874
838.*
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300
12037
839.kynes
Intel Core Duo T2450
11947
840.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500
11834
841.hAyO
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
10972
842.*
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500
10649
843.Namiga
AMD E Series E-350
10048
844.krampak
AMD E Series E-450
9654
845.*
AMD E1 2500
9443
846.kynes
Intel Core Duo T2300
9380
847.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 630
9250
848.*
AMD C Series C-60
9216
849.cobito
AMD C Series C-60
9214
850.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500
9168
851.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 531
9163
852.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500
8811
This one
853.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 521
8600
854.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T5270
8309
855.*
AMD E-Series E-300
7268
856.*
Intel Atom N450
5664
857.cobito
Intel Atom N450
4972
858.*
Intel Atom N270
4477
859.*
Intel Atom N2600
4374
860.cobito
Intel Atom Z520
3658
861.Namiga
Intel Atom N450
3401
862.*
Intel Atom Z520
2844
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4