| | | | | | |

Result in mode SSE

Submitted anonymously


November 23th 2024 at 17:29

from Windows 10 (22H2) [10.0.19045.5198]
 
Monothread
Multithread [2 threads]
Test#1 (Integers)
1481 points
2670 points (x 1.8)
Test#2 (FP)
3263 points
5622 points (x 1.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1253 points
1620 points (x 1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
883 points
1080 points (x 1.2)
TOTAL
6880 points
10992 points (x 1.6)

Screenshot
hlbm
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:
          
CPU

Testing details
Frequency (measured)
1291 MHz

Specs
Official name
Genuine Intel(R) CPU U7300 @ 1.30GHz
CPUID
1067a
Core
Peryn-3M
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 956
Cores/Threads
2/2
TDP
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
3072 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
Release date
January 2009
Mean monothread perf.
6.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
11.24k points
          
Computer

Testing details
BIOS brand
INSYDE
BIOS version
V2.30 [09/29/2009]

Specs
Official name
Acer Aspire 4810T V2.30
Motherboard
Acer Aspire 4810T
Revision
Base Board Version
Architecture
Socket
BGA 956
Memory FF
SODIMM
Memory type
DDR3
          
Memory

Testing details
Slot#0
Slot#1
Total RAM
4 GB
Bus width
bits
Frequency
800 MHz
Type
DDR3
Form factor
SODIMM

Slots 0, 1: Samsung M471B5673EH1-CF8
P/N
M471B5673EH1-CF8
Official brand
80CE
Type
Form factor
SODIMM
Stock frequency
1066 MHz
Size
2048 MB per module
Module
PC3-8500
Kit
1 x 2048 MB
ECC
no
          
Performance

Monothread performance graphs
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.

Test#1 (Integers)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#2 (FP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#1 (Memory)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graphs
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.

Test#1 (Integers)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#2 (FP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#1 (Memory)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Monothread ranking
User
Model
Score
776.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E4400
7672
777.*
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2180
7656
778.kynes
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250
7647
779.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 515J
7626
780.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E4400
7561
781.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 521
7484
782.cobito
Intel Celeron D 341
7481
783.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800
7469
784.cobito
Intel Pentium D 820
7464
785.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 520
7464
786.cobito
Intel Pentium D 915
7454
787.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo E6300
7385
788.*
AMD A4 5000
7376
789.Namiga
Intel Celeron M 575
7275
790.cobito
Intel Celeron D 335
7174
791.krampak
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
7060
792.Fassou
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100
7048
793.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E4300
7040
794.*
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300
7037
795.*
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2160
7008
796.*
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300
6880
This one
797.*
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500
6744
798.*
AMD E1 2500
6645
799.kynes
Intel Core Duo T2450
6599
800.cobito
Intel Celeron D 326
6538
801.*
AMD E2 Series 3800
6521
802.krampak
AMD E Series E-450
6512
803.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500
6421
804.kwankahung
AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
6282
805.cobito
Intel Celeron 420
6267
806.Namiga
AMD E Series E-350
6262
807.*
Intel Celeron D 331
6195
808.Hin
Intel Core i3-370M
6106
809.Namiga
Intel Core i7-720QM
6013
810.kynes
Intel Core Duo T2300
5584
811.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T5270
5281
812.*
AMD E-Series E-300
5224
813.*
AMD C Series C-60
5213
814.cobito
AMD C Series C-60
5101
815.*
Intel Atom N450
3858
816.cobito
Intel Atom N450
3822

Multithread ranking
User
Model
Score
764.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E4400
14184
765.*
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2180
14159
766.cobito
Intel Pentium D 820
14076
767.krampak
Intel Pentium D 925
14027
768.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E4400
13944
769.kynes
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250
13822
770.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800
13488
771.*
Intel Celeron N3060
13363
772.Yorus
Intel Core 2 Duo E6320
13336
773.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E6320
13152
774.Hin
Intel Core i3-370M
13080
775.krampak
Intel Pentium D 950
12987
776.kwankahung
AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
12907
777.Fassou
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100
12904
778.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E4300
12895
779.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo E6300
12887
780.*
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2160
12874
781.*
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300
12037
782.kynes
Intel Core Duo T2450
11947
783.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500
11834
784.*
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300
10992
This one
785.*
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500
10649
786.Namiga
AMD E Series E-350
10048
787.krampak
AMD E Series E-450
9654
788.*
AMD E1 2500
9443
789.kynes
Intel Core Duo T2300
9380
790.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 630
9250
791.*
AMD C Series C-60
9216
792.cobito
AMD C Series C-60
9214
793.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500
9168
794.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 531
9163
795.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 520
8671
796.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 521
8600
797.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T5270
8309
798.*
AMD E-Series E-300
7268
799.*
Intel Atom N450
5664
800.cobito
Intel Atom N450
4972
801.*
Intel Atom N270
4477
802.cobito
Intel Atom Z520
3658
803.Namiga
Intel Atom N450
3401
804.*
Intel Atom Z520
2844

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4