| | | | | | |

Result in mode SSE

Submitted anonymously


November 08th 2023 at 22:35

from Windows 10 (22H2) [10.0.19045.3448]
 
Monothread
Multithread [2 threads]
Test#1 (Integers)
1485 points
2453 points (x 1.7)
Test#2 (FP)
3271 points
5247 points (x 1.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1260 points
2088 points (x 1.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
922 points
1127 points (x 1.2)
TOTAL
6938 points
10915 points (x 1.6)

Screenshot
hlbm
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:
          
CPU

Testing details
Frequency (measured)
1290 MHz

Specs
Official name
Genuine Intel(R) CPU U7300 @ 1.30GHz
CPUID
1067a
Core
Peryn-3M
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 956
Cores/Threads
2/2
TDP
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
3072 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
Release date
January 2009
Mean monothread perf.
6.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
11.24k points
          
Computer

Testing details
BIOS brand
INSYDE
BIOS version
V2.30 [09/29/2009]

Specs
Official name
Acer Aspire 4810T V2.30
Motherboard
Acer Aspire 4810T
Revision
Base Board Version
Architecture
Socket
BGA 956
Memory FF
SODIMM
Memory type
DDR3
          
Memory

Testing details
Slot#0
Slot#1
Total RAM
4 GB
Bus width
bits
Frequency
800 MHz
Type
DDR3
Form factor
SODIMM

Slots 0, 1: Samsung M471B5673EH1-CF8
P/N
M471B5673EH1-CF8
Official brand
80CE
Type
Form factor
SODIMM
Stock frequency
1066 MHz
Size
2048 MB per module
Module
PC3-8500
Kit
1 x 2048 MB
ECC
no
          
Performance

Monothread performance graphs
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.

Test#1 (Integers)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#2 (FP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#1 (Memory)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graphs
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.

Test#1 (Integers)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#2 (FP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#1 (Memory)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Monothread ranking
User
Model
Score
849.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E4400
7672
850.*
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2180
7656
851.kynes
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250
7647
852.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 515J
7626
853.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E4400
7561
854.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 521
7484
855.cobito
Intel Celeron D 341
7481
856.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800
7469
857.cobito
Intel Pentium D 820
7464
858.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 520
7464
859.cobito
Intel Pentium D 915
7454
860.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo E6300
7385
861.*
AMD A4 5000
7376
862.Namiga
Intel Celeron M 575
7275
863.cobito
Intel Celeron D 335
7174
864.krampak
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
7060
865.Fassou
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100
7048
866.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E4300
7040
867.*
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300
7037
868.*
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2160
7008
869.*
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300
6938
This one
870.*
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500
6744
871.*
AMD E1 2500
6645
872.kynes
Intel Core Duo T2450
6599
873.cobito
Intel Celeron D 326
6538
874.*
AMD E2 Series 3800
6521
875.krampak
AMD E Series E-450
6512
876.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500
6421
877.kwankahung
AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
6282
878.cobito
Intel Celeron 420
6267
879.Namiga
AMD E Series E-350
6262
880.*
Intel Celeron D 331
6195
881.Hin
Intel Core i3-370M
6106
882.Namiga
Intel Core i7-720QM
6013
883.kynes
Intel Core Duo T2300
5584
884.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T5270
5281
885.*
AMD E-Series E-300
5224
886.*
AMD C Series C-60
5213
887.cobito
AMD C Series C-60
5101
888.*
Intel Atom N450
3858
889.cobito
Intel Atom N450
3822

Multithread ranking
User
Model
Score
838.cobito
Intel Pentium D 820
14076
839.krampak
Intel Pentium D 925
14027
840.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E4400
13944
841.kynes
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250
13822
842.*
Intel Celeron T3000
13792
843.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800
13488
844.*
Intel Celeron N3060
13363
845.Yorus
Intel Core 2 Duo E6320
13336
846.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E6320
13152
847.Hin
Intel Core i3-370M
13080
848.krampak
Intel Pentium D 950
12987
849.kwankahung
AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
12907
850.Fassou
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100
12904
851.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E4300
12895
852.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo E6300
12887
853.*
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2160
12874
854.*
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300
12037
855.kynes
Intel Core Duo T2450
11947
856.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500
11834
857.hAyO
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
10972
858.*
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300
10915
This one
859.Namiga
AMD E Series E-350
10048
860.krampak
AMD E Series E-450
9654
861.*
AMD E1 2500
9443
862.kynes
Intel Core Duo T2300
9380
863.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 630
9250
864.*
AMD C Series C-60
9216
865.cobito
AMD C Series C-60
9214
866.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500
9168
867.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 531
9163
868.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 520
8671
869.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 521
8600
870.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T5270
8309
871.*
AMD E-Series E-300
7268
872.*
Intel Atom N450
5664
873.cobito
Intel Atom N450
4972
874.*
Intel Atom N270
4477
875.*
Intel Atom N2600
4374
876.cobito
Intel Atom Z520
3658
877.Namiga
Intel Atom N450
3401
878.*
Intel Atom Z520
2844

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4