| | | | | | |

Result in mode SSE

Submitted anonymously


November 08th 2023 at 22:35

from Windows 10 (22H2) [10.0.19045.3448]
 
Monothread
Multithread [2 threads]
Test#1 (Integers)
1485 points
2453 points (x 1.7)
Test#2 (FP)
3271 points
5247 points (x 1.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1260 points
2088 points (x 1.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
922 points
1127 points (x 1.2)
TOTAL
6938 points
10915 points (x 1.6)

Screenshot
hlbm
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:
          
CPU

Testing details
Frequency (measured)
1290 MHz

Specs
Official name
Genuine Intel(R) CPU U7300 @ 1.30GHz
CPUID
1067a
Core
Peryn-3M
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 956
Cores/Threads
2/2
TDP
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
3072 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
Release date
January 2009
Mean monothread perf.
6.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
11.24k points
          
Computer

Testing details
BIOS brand
INSYDE
BIOS version
V2.30 [09/29/2009]

Specs
Official name
Acer Aspire 4810T V2.30
Motherboard
Acer Aspire 4810T
Revision
Base Board Version
Architecture
Socket
BGA 956
Memory FF
SODIMM
Memory type
DDR3
          
Memory

Testing details
Slot#0
Slot#1
Total RAM
4 GB
Bus width
bits
Frequency
800 MHz
Type
DDR3
Form factor
SODIMM

Slots 0, 1: Samsung M471B5673EH1-CF8
P/N
M471B5673EH1-CF8
Official brand
80CE
Type
Form factor
SODIMM
Stock frequency
1066 MHz
Size
2048 MB per module
Module
PC3-8500
Kit
1 x 2048 MB
ECC
no
          
Performance

Monothread performance graphs
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.

Test#1 (Integers)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#2 (FP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#1 (Memory)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graphs
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.

Test#1 (Integers)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#2 (FP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#1 (Memory)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Monothread ranking
User
Model
Score
828.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E4400
7672
829.*
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2180
7656
830.kynes
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250
7647
831.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 515J
7626
832.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E4400
7561
833.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 521
7484
834.cobito
Intel Celeron D 341
7481
835.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800
7469
836.cobito
Intel Pentium D 820
7464
837.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 520
7464
838.cobito
Intel Pentium D 915
7454
839.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo E6300
7385
840.*
AMD A4 5000
7376
841.Namiga
Intel Celeron M 575
7275
842.cobito
Intel Celeron D 335
7174
843.krampak
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
7060
844.Fassou
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100
7048
845.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E4300
7040
846.*
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300
7037
847.*
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2160
7008
848.*
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300
6938
This one
849.*
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500
6744
850.*
AMD E1 2500
6645
851.kynes
Intel Core Duo T2450
6599
852.cobito
Intel Celeron D 326
6538
853.*
AMD E2 Series 3800
6521
854.krampak
AMD E Series E-450
6512
855.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500
6421
856.kwankahung
AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
6282
857.cobito
Intel Celeron 420
6267
858.Namiga
AMD E Series E-350
6262
859.*
Intel Celeron D 331
6195
860.Hin
Intel Core i3-370M
6106
861.Namiga
Intel Core i7-720QM
6013
862.kynes
Intel Core Duo T2300
5584
863.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T5270
5281
864.*
AMD E-Series E-300
5224
865.*
AMD C Series C-60
5213
866.cobito
AMD C Series C-60
5101
867.*
Intel Atom N450
3858
868.cobito
Intel Atom N450
3822

Multithread ranking
User
Model
Score
817.cobito
Intel Pentium D 820
14076
818.krampak
Intel Pentium D 925
14027
819.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E4400
13944
820.kynes
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250
13822
821.*
Intel Celeron T3000
13792
822.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800
13488
823.*
Intel Celeron N3060
13363
824.Yorus
Intel Core 2 Duo E6320
13336
825.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E6320
13152
826.Hin
Intel Core i3-370M
13080
827.krampak
Intel Pentium D 950
12987
828.kwankahung
AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
12907
829.Fassou
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100
12904
830.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E4300
12895
831.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo E6300
12887
832.*
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2160
12874
833.*
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300
12037
834.kynes
Intel Core Duo T2450
11947
835.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500
11834
836.hAyO
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
10972
837.*
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300
10915
This one
838.Namiga
AMD E Series E-350
10048
839.krampak
AMD E Series E-450
9654
840.*
AMD E1 2500
9443
841.kynes
Intel Core Duo T2300
9380
842.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 630
9250
843.*
AMD C Series C-60
9216
844.cobito
AMD C Series C-60
9214
845.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500
9168
846.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 531
9163
847.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 520
8671
848.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 521
8600
849.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T5270
8309
850.*
AMD E-Series E-300
7268
851.*
Intel Atom N450
5664
852.cobito
Intel Atom N450
4972
853.*
Intel Atom N270
4477
854.*
Intel Atom N2600
4374
855.cobito
Intel Atom Z520
3658
856.Namiga
Intel Atom N450
3401
857.*
Intel Atom Z520
2844

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4