| | | | | | |

Result in mode SSE

Submitted anonymously


February 13th 2025 at 04:07

from Windows 10 (22H2) [10.0.19045.5487]
 
Monothread
Multithread [2 threads]
Test#1 (Integers)
2016 points
3394 points (x 1.7)
Test#2 (FP)
4586 points
4590 points (x 1.0)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1644 points
1946 points (x 1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
940 points
877 points (x 0.9)
TOTAL
9186 points
10807 points (x 1.2)

Screenshot
hlbm
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:
          
CPU

Testing details
Frequency (measured)
1782 MHz

Specs
Official name
Celeron(R) Dual-Core CPU T3000 @ 1.80GHz
CPUID
1067a
Core
Penryn-3M
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.8 GHz
Socket
Socket P
Cores/Threads
2/2
TDP
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
Release date
June 2009
Mean monothread perf.
9.04k points
Mean multithread perf.
8.55k points
          
Computer

Testing details
BIOS brand
American Megatrends Inc.
BIOS version
218 [04/09/2010]

Specs
Official name
ASUSTeK Computer Inc. K50IJ 1.0
Motherboard
ASUSTeK Computer Inc. K50IJ
Revision
1.0
Architecture
Socket
Socket P 478
Memory FF
SODIMM
Memory type
DDR2
          
Memory

Testing details
Slot#0
Unknown N/A (2048 MB)
Slot#1
Unknown N/A (2048 MB)
Total RAM
4 GB
Bus width
64 bits
Frequency
667 MHz
Type
DDR2
Form factor
SODIMM

Slots 0, 1: Unknown N/A
P/N
N/A
Official brand
N/A
Type
Form factor
SODIMM
Size
2048 MB per module
          
Performance

Monothread performance graphs
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.

Test#1 (Integers)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#2 (FP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#1 (Memory)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graphs
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.

Test#1 (Integers)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#2 (FP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#1 (Memory)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Monothread ranking
User
Model
Score
779.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
10726
780.*
Intel Pentium J2900
10645
781.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
10583
782.*
Intel Xeon X5365
10500
783.Yorus
Intel Celeron N2840
10445
784.*
Intel Pentium N3530
10441
785.Namiga
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400
10344
786.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
10332
787.*
Intel Celeron N2840
10272
788.*
Intel Celeron N3060
10147
789.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400
10106
790.*
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700
10046
791.*
Intel Core i3-2367M
9959
792.*
Intel Celeron J1900
9783
793.*
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
9766
794.danipro23
AMD Athlon II M300
9567
795.krampak
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5
9522
796.desvest
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
9443
797.*
Intel Celeron N3150
9345
798.cobito
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
9208
799.*
Intel Celeron T3000
9186
This one
800.*
Intel Celeron T3000
9156
801.cobito
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
9055
802.*
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
8924
803.krampak
Intel Pentium D 950
8809
804.hAyO
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
8770
805.Yorus
Intel Core 2 Duo E6320
8728
806.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E4500
8338
807.*
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2200
8306
808.Yorus
AMD Athlon 5150 APU
8259
809.cobito
Intel Celeron D 352
8228
810.*
Intel Celeron D 351
8120
811.cobito
Intel Celeron D 351
8107
812.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E6320
8087
813.kynes
Intel Pentium T3400
8049
814.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 531
7955
815.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 519K
7948
816.cobito
Intel Celeron D 347
7934
817.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 630
7925
818.cobito
Intel Celeron D 346
7796
819.krampak
Intel Pentium D 925
7696

Multithread ranking
User
Model
Score
809.cobito
Intel Pentium D 820
14076
810.krampak
Intel Pentium D 925
14027
811.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E4400
13944
812.kynes
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250
13822
813.*
Intel Celeron T3000
13792
814.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800
13488
815.*
Intel Celeron N3060
13363
816.Yorus
Intel Core 2 Duo E6320
13336
817.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E6320
13152
818.Hin
Intel Core i3-370M
13080
819.krampak
Intel Pentium D 950
12987
820.kwankahung
AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
12907
821.Fassou
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100
12904
822.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E4300
12895
823.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo E6300
12887
824.*
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2160
12874
825.*
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300
12037
826.kynes
Intel Core Duo T2450
11947
827.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500
11834
828.hAyO
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
10972
829.*
Intel Celeron T3000
10807
This one
830.Namiga
AMD E Series E-350
10048
831.krampak
AMD E Series E-450
9654
832.*
AMD E1 2500
9443
833.kynes
Intel Core Duo T2300
9380
834.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 630
9250
835.*
AMD C Series C-60
9216
836.cobito
AMD C Series C-60
9214
837.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500
9168
838.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 531
9163
839.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 520
8671
840.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 521
8600
841.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T5270
8309
842.*
AMD E-Series E-300
7268
843.*
Intel Atom N450
5664
844.cobito
Intel Atom N450
4972
845.*
Intel Atom N270
4477
846.cobito
Intel Atom Z520
3658
847.Namiga
Intel Atom N450
3401
848.*
Intel Atom Z520
2844
 
 
 
 

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4