| | | | | | |

Result in mode SSE

Submitted anonymously


December 16th 2020 at 22:26

from Windows 10 (20H2) [10.0.19042.685]
 
Monothread
Multithread [2 threads]
Test#1 (Integers)
1838 points
3466 points (x 1.9)
Test#2 (FP)
1652 points
3108 points (x 1.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1604 points
2956 points (x 1.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
1681 points
1341 points (x 0.8)
TOTAL
6775 points
10871 points (x 1.6)

Screenshot
hlbm
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:
          
CPU

Testing details
Frequency (measured)
1619 MHz

Specs
Official name
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU L7500 @ 1.60GHz
CPUID
6fa
Core
Merom
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 479
Cores/Threads
2/2
TDP
17 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
Release date
October 2006
Mean monothread perf.
6.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
10.65k points
          
Computer

Testing details
BIOS brand
LENOVO
BIOS version
7SET39WW (1.25 ) [03/22/2011]

Specs
Official name
LENOVO 7767B7U ThinkPad X61 Tablet
Motherboard
LENOVO 7767B7U
Revision
Not Available
Architecture
Socket
BGA 479
          
Memory

Testing details
Slot#0
Unknown N/A (2048 MB)
Slot#1
Unknown N/A (2048 MB)
Total RAM
4 GB
Bus width
64 bits
Frequency
667 MHz
Type
DDR2
Form factor
SODIMM

Slots 0, 1: Unknown N/A
P/N
SODIMM000
Official brand
Mfg 0
Type
Form factor
SODIMM
Stock frequency
666 MHz
Size
2048 MB per module
          
Performance

Monothread performance graphs
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.

Test#1 (Integers)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#2 (FP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#1 (Memory)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graphs
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.

Test#1 (Integers)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#2 (FP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#1 (Memory)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Monothread ranking
User
Model
Score
848.*
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2180
7656
849.kynes
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250
7647
850.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 515J
7626
851.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E4400
7561
852.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 521
7484
853.cobito
Intel Celeron D 341
7481
854.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800
7469
855.cobito
Intel Pentium D 820
7464
856.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 520
7464
857.cobito
Intel Pentium D 915
7454
858.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo E6300
7385
859.*
AMD A4 5000
7376
860.Namiga
Intel Celeron M 575
7275
861.cobito
Intel Celeron D 335
7174
862.krampak
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
7060
863.Fassou
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100
7048
864.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E4300
7040
865.*
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300
7037
866.*
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2160
7008
867.cobito
Intel Celeron D 331
6851
868.*
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500
6775
This one
869.*
AMD E1 2500
6645
870.kynes
Intel Core Duo T2450
6599
871.cobito
Intel Celeron D 326
6538
872.*
AMD E2 Series 3800
6521
873.krampak
AMD E Series E-450
6512
874.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500
6421
875.kwankahung
AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
6282
876.cobito
Intel Celeron 420
6267
877.Namiga
AMD E Series E-350
6262
878.*
Intel Celeron D 331
6195
879.Hin
Intel Core i3-370M
6106
880.Namiga
Intel Core i7-720QM
6013
881.kynes
Intel Core Duo T2300
5584
882.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T5270
5281
883.*
AMD E-Series E-300
5224
884.*
AMD C Series C-60
5213
885.cobito
AMD C Series C-60
5101
886.*
Intel Atom N450
3858
887.cobito
Intel Atom N450
3822
888.*
Intel Atom N270
3419

Multithread ranking
User
Model
Score
836.cobito
Intel Pentium D 820
14076
837.krampak
Intel Pentium D 925
14027
838.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E4400
13944
839.kynes
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250
13822
840.*
Intel Celeron T3000
13792
841.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800
13488
842.*
Intel Celeron N3060
13363
843.Yorus
Intel Core 2 Duo E6320
13336
844.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E6320
13152
845.Hin
Intel Core i3-370M
13080
846.krampak
Intel Pentium D 950
12987
847.kwankahung
AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
12907
848.Fassou
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100
12904
849.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E4300
12895
850.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo E6300
12887
851.*
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2160
12874
852.*
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300
12037
853.kynes
Intel Core Duo T2450
11947
854.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500
11834
855.hAyO
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
10972
856.*
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500
10871
This one
857.Namiga
AMD E Series E-350
10048
858.krampak
AMD E Series E-450
9654
859.*
AMD E1 2500
9443
860.kynes
Intel Core Duo T2300
9380
861.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 630
9250
862.*
AMD C Series C-60
9216
863.cobito
AMD C Series C-60
9214
864.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500
9168
865.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 531
9163
866.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 520
8671
867.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 521
8600
868.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T5270
8309
869.*
AMD E-Series E-300
7268
870.*
Intel Atom N450
5664
871.cobito
Intel Atom N450
4972
872.*
Intel Atom N270
4477
873.*
Intel Atom N2600
4374
874.cobito
Intel Atom Z520
3658
875.Namiga
Intel Atom N450
3401
876.*
Intel Atom Z520
2844

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4