| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 1600X vs Core i7-7700K


Description
The 1600X is based on Zen architecture while the i7-7700K is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600X gets a score of 173.2 k points while the i7-7700K gets 289.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-7700K is 1.7 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
906e9
Core
Summit Ridge
Kaby Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
95 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2017
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
60.09k points
76.98k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.2k points
289.9k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
1600X
i7-7700K
Test#1 (Integers)
3.95k
4.63k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
18.36k
18.92k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
6.22k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.35k
13.92k (x0.8)
TOTAL
45.06k
43.7k (x0.97)

Multithread

1600X

i7-7700K
Test#1 (Integers)
19.47k
18.53k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
77.19k
86.49k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.4k
28.78k (x1.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.25k
9.67k (x0.79)
TOTAL
124.3k
143.47k (x1.15)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600X
i7-7700K
Test#1 (Integers)
14.63k
30.47k (x2.08)
Test#2 (FP)
24.09k
26.94k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.51k
6.25k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.86k
13.32k (x0.84)
TOTAL
60.09k
76.98k (x1.28)

Multithread

1600X

i7-7700K
Test#1 (Integers)
48.75k
127.81k (x2.62)
Test#2 (FP)
80.1k
123.7k (x1.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.5k
29.34k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.85k
9.05k (x0.46)
TOTAL
173.2k
289.9k (x1.67)

Performance/W
1600X
i7-7700K
Test#1 (Integers)
513 points/W
1345 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
843 points/W
1302 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
258 points/W
309 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
95 points/W
TOTAL
1823 points/W
3052 points/W

Performance/GHz
1600X
i7-7700K
Test#1 (Integers)
3659 points/GHz
6770 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6022 points/GHz
5987 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1378 points/GHz
1389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3966 points/GHz
2960 points/GHz
TOTAL
15023 points/GHz
17106 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4