| | | | | | |

Result in mode AVX

Submitted by Namiga


April 17th 2018 at 13:43

from Windows 10 (Redstone 3 - 1709) [10.0.16299.334]
 
Monothread
Multithread [2 threads]
Test#1 (Integers)
7623 points
9233 points (x 1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
13992 points
12301 points (x 0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3137 points
2985 points (x 1.0)
Test#1 (Memory)
2177 points
1839 points (x 0.8)
TOTAL
26929 points
26358 points (x 1.0)

Screenshot
hlbm
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:
          
CPU

Testing details
Model
Frequency (measured)
3617 MHz

Specs
Official name
AMD A9-9420 RADEON R5, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G
CPUID
670f00
Core
Stoney Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
Socket
Micro-BGA
Cores/Threads
2/2
TDP
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
Release date
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
33.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
46.33k points
          
Computer

Testing details
Model
BIOS brand
Insyde
BIOS version
F.21 [11/17/2017]

Specs
Official name
HP HP Laptop 15-bw0xx Type1ProductConfigId
Motherboard
HP 8330
Revision
27.32
Architecture
Socket
BGA FT4
          
Memory

Testing details
Slot#1
Kingston HyperX (8192 MB)
Total RAM
8 GB
Bus width
64 bits
Frequency
1866 MHz
Type
DDR4
Form factor
SODIMM

Slot 1: Kingston HyperX
P/N
KHX3200C20S4/8G
Official brand
Kingston
Type
Form factor
SODIMM
Stock frequency
3200 MHz
Size
8192 MB per module
Module
PC4-25600
Timings
16
Kit
2 x 8192 MB
ECC
no
          
Performance

Monothread performance graphs
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.

Test#1 (Integers)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#2 (FP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#1 (Memory)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graphs
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.

Test#1 (Integers)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#2 (FP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#1 (Memory)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Monothread ranking
User
Model
Score
601.*
Intel Core i7-3687U
28546
602.*
AMD FX 8350
28535
603.*
Intel Core i5-3230M
28531
604.*
Intel Celeron N5105
28449
605.*
AMD A12 9720P
28369
606.Yorus
Intel Core i5-3210M
28322
607.Clipper
AMD FX 8350
28299
608.*
Intel Pentium 4415U
28227
609.*
Intel Core i7-1185G7
28172
610.maria jesus cobo
AMD A9 9425
28135
611.*
Intel Pentium Silver N6000
28127
612.cobito
Intel Celeron G3900TE
28015
613.*
Intel Core i7-2600S
27830
614.*
Intel Core i7-3930K
27763
615.*
Intel Core i5-2500
27606
616.majdshaheen
Intel Pentium 4415U
27580
617.*
Intel Pentium G2030
27437
618.krampak
Intel Pentium G3220
27392
619.krampak
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
27256
620.*
Intel Celeron N5100
27173
621.Namiga
AMD A9 9420
26929
This one
622.*
Intel Celeron G3900TE
26654
623.kynes
Intel Core i5-5200U
26621
624.*
Intel Celeron N5095
26604
625.*
AMD FX 8320E
26582
626.gamboa
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
26397
627.krampak
Intel Pentium 4415U
26197
628.krampak
Intel Core i5-2400
26179
629.Namiga
Intel Core i5-3210M
26154
630.*
Intel Core i3-5005U
26089
631.*
Intel Core i7-3630QM
25929
632.krampak
Intel Pentium G2020
25871
633.*
Intel Core i7-2640M
25865
634.*
Intel Core i5-2400
25701
635.*
AMD FX 6300
25480
636.*
Intel Core i5-2320
25393
637.TinMan
Intel Core m3-7Y30
25149
638.VINEX
Intel Core i3-5005U
25128
639.krampak
Intel Core i3-3220
25056
640.*
Intel Core i5-3210M
25023
641.*
Intel Core i7-920
24964

Multithread ranking
User
Model
Score
776.hAyO
Intel Core i5-450M
30825
777.*
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
30640
778.Namiga
AMD Athlon 5350
30640
779.*
Intel Core i5-3437U
30456
780.Yorus
AMD Athlon 5150 APU
30064
781.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
29795
782.*
Intel Core i3-370M
29601
783.*
Intel Core i5-M 540
29536
784.*
Intel Pentium E6600
29403
785.*
AMD A6 9220e
29390
786.hAyO
Intel Pentium E5500
28214
787.*
AMD A6 6310
28189
788.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
28019
789.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
27976
790.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
27923
791.*
AMD A4 6300B
27536
792.*
Intel Core i5-450M
27371
793.krampak
AMD A6 9210
27129
794.*
Intel Celeron G530
26951
795.cobito
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5400
26795
796.Namiga
AMD A9 9420
26358
This one
797.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
25760
798.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E7200
25238
799.cobito
Intel Pentium E5200 (R0)
24907
800.*
AMD A4 5000
24707
801.*
Intel Celeron E3300
24695
802.Namiga
Intel Celeron 3855U
24556
803.Namiga
AMD A4 Series 3300
24240
804.mdigerat
Intel Core P9400
23315
805.*
Intel Pentium Dual-Core T4500
23050
806.Namiga
Intel Core i7-720QM
22949
807.*
Intel Pentium P6200
22910
808.*
AMD E2 Series 3800
22518
809.Rober García
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
22360
810.krampak
Intel Xeon E5502
22279
811.jos_shua
Intel Pentium E5200 (M0)
22021
812.*
Intel Core i3-2367M
21517
813.kynes
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400
21502
814.*
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600
20994
815.PEDRO CEPEDA
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
20833
816.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600
20628

Signatures and results

If you want customized signatures for your site, forum, community, etc, contact us. It's free!

Official style

signature
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:

Ranking style

signature
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4