| | | | | | |

Result in mode FPU

Submitted by krampak


July 24th 2018 at 09:45

from Windows 7 [6.1.7601]
 
Monothread
Multithread [8 threads]
Test#1 (Integers)
1473 points
11685 points (x 7.9)
Test#2 (FP)
3289 points
26547 points (x 8.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2142 points
16408 points (x 7.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
1902 points
3273 points (x 1.7)
TOTAL
8806 points
57913 points (x 6.6)

Screenshot
hlbm
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:
          
CPU

Testing details
Frequency (measured)
2322 MHz

Specs
Official name
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5606 @ 2.13GHz
CPUID
206c2
Core
Westmere-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.133 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.133 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4 /4
TDP
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
Release date
February 2011
          
Computer

Testing details
BIOS brand
HP
BIOS version
D22 [08/16/2015]

Specs
Official name
HP ProLiant ML350 G6 Not Specified
Motherboard
Architecture
Socket
LGA 1366
          
Memory

Testing details
Slot#2
Slot#5
Slot#8
Slot#11
Slot#14
Total RAM
20 GB
Bus width
72 bits
Frequency
1333 MHz
Type
DDR3
Form factor
DIMM

Slots 2, 5, 8, 11, 14: Kingston KVR1333D3N9/4G
P/N
99U5471-012.A00LF
Official brand
Kingston
Type
Form factor
DIMM
Stock frequency
1333 MHz
Size
4096 MB per module
Module
PC3-10600
Voltage
1,5 V
Kit
1 x 4096 MB
ECC
no
          
Performance

Monothread performance graphs
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.

Test#1 (Integers)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#2 (FP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#1 (Memory)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graphs
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.

Test#1 (Integers)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#2 (FP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#1 (Memory)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Monothread ranking
User
Model
Score
857.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
10332
858.*
Intel Celeron N2840
10272
859.*
Intel Celeron N3060
10147
860.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400
10106
861.*
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700
10046
862.*
Intel Core i3-2367M
9959
863.*
AMD A6 6310
9958
864.*
Intel Celeron J1900
9783
865.*
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
9766
866.Namiga
AMD Athlon 5350
9725
867.danipro23
AMD Athlon II M300
9567
868.krampak
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5
9522
869.desvest
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
9443
870.*
Intel Celeron N3150
9345
871.cobito
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
9208
872.cobito
Intel Celeron N3150
9175
873.*
Intel Celeron T3000
9156
874.cobito
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
9055
875.*
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
8924
876.krampak
Intel Pentium D 950
8809
877.krampak
Intel Xeon E5606
8806
This one
878.Yorus
Intel Core 2 Duo E6320
8728
879.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E4500
8338
880.*
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2200
8306
881.Yorus
AMD Athlon 5150 APU
8259
882.cobito
Intel Celeron D 352
8228
883.*
Intel Celeron D 351
8120
884.cobito
Intel Celeron D 351
8107
885.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E6320
8087
886.kynes
Intel Pentium T3400
8049
887.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 531
7955
888.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 519K
7948
889.cobito
Intel Celeron D 347
7934
890.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 630
7925
891.cobito
Intel Celeron D 346
7796
892.krampak
Intel Pentium D 925
7696
893.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E4400
7672
894.*
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2180
7656
895.kynes
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250
7647
896.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 515J
7626
897.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E4400
7561

Multithread ranking
User
Model
Score
680.*
Intel Core m3-7Y30
64122
681.krampak
Intel Core i7-930
63756
682.Namiga
Intel Core i3-3220
63569
683.Magog
Intel Core i5-3340M
62754
684.*
Intel Core i7-2600K
62665
685.*
AMD A10 9700
61895
686.jordiqui
Intel Core i5-3360M
61671
687.cobito
Intel Core i5-3320M
61654
688.cobito
Intel Celeron J4105
61639
689.*
Intel Core i5-4210U
61530
690.*
Intel Core i7-4600U
61500
691.*
Intel Core i5-4250U
61469
692.*
Intel Core i7-860
61195
693.*
Intel Core i5-3320M
61096
694.*
Intel Celeron N4120
61032
695.*
Intel Core i5-4200U
60704
696.Namiga
Intel Core i5-4210U
59892
697._Neptunno_
Intel Pentium G3260
58885
698.*
Intel Core i5-3340M
58831
699.krampak
Intel Core i3-6100U
58262
700.krampak
Intel Xeon E5606
57913
This one
701.*
Intel Core i5-3230M
57485
702.*
Intel Pentium 4415U
57120
703.*
Intel Core i3-5005U
57115
704.ignacio00
AMD FX 6300
57072
705.krampak
Intel Pentium 4415U
56632
706.Namiga
Intel Xeon X3430
56171
707.majdshaheen
Intel Pentium 4415U
56094
708.Namiga
Intel Core i5-3210M
55874
709.krampak
Intel Core i3-3220
55815
710.TinMan
Intel Core m3-7Y30
55773
711.*
Intel Core i5-3210M
55262
712.*
Intel Core i3-4150
55004
713.rul3s
Intel Xeon E5440
54930
714.*
Intel Core i7-2640M
54855
715.*
Intel Pentium N5000
54759
716.Yorus
Intel Core i5-3210M
54364
717.windowsworld_
Intel Core i3-2120
54117
718.Namiga
Intel Core m7-6Y75
53581
719.VINEX
Intel Core i3-5005U
52862
720.*
Intel Core i7-3537U
52856

Signatures and results

If you want customized signatures for your site, forum, community, etc, contact us. It's free!

Official style

signature
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:

Ranking style

signature
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4