| | | | | | |

Xeon Silver 4110 vs Core i9-9900K


Description
The 4110 is based on Skylake architecture while the i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the i9-9900K gets 545.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 1.9 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50654
906ec
Core
Skylake-SP
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA3647
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
85 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
16384 kB
Date
July 2017
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
45.82k points
86.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.48k points
545.3k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
4110
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3k
5.17k (x1.73)
Test#2 (FP)
12.29k
21.15k (x1.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.64k
7.01k (x1.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.55k
15.32k (x2.34)
TOTAL
25.46k
48.66k (x1.91)

Multithread

4110

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
20.42k
38.45k (x1.88)
Test#2 (FP)
95.83k
155.68k (x1.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.88k
51k (x1.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.7k
18.26k (x1.88)
TOTAL
156.83k
263.38k (x1.68)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4110
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
18.78k
33.62k (x1.79)
Test#2 (FP)
16.25k
30.02k (x1.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
7.17k (x1.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
15.43k (x2.27)
TOTAL
45.82k
86.24k (x1.88)

Multithread

4110

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
133.55k
248.93k (x1.86)
Test#2 (FP)
108.43k
224.43k (x2.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.02k
53.39k (x1.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.48k
18.54k (x1.96)
TOTAL
281.48k
545.3k (x1.94)

Performance/W
4110
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
1571 points/W
2620 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1276 points/W
2362 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
353 points/W
562 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
195 points/W
TOTAL
3311 points/W
5740 points/W

Performance/GHz
4110
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
6259 points/GHz
6724 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5417 points/GHz
6003 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1330 points/GHz
1434 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2267 points/GHz
3087 points/GHz
TOTAL
15273 points/GHz
17247 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4