Xeon E5-2697 v2 vs Core i9-9900K
Description
The E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2697 v2 gets a score of 419.1 k points while the i9-9900K gets 263.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 1.6 times faster than the i9-9900K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2697 v2 gets a score of 419.1 k points while the i9-9900K gets 263.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 1.6 times faster than the i9-9900K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306e4
906ec
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
12 /24
8/16
TDP
130 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2013
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
27.92k points
86.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
633.14k points
545.3k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2697 v2
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3.44k
5.17k (x1.51)
Test#2 (FP)
9.54k
21.15k (x2.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.21k
7.01k (x1.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.94k
15.32k (x3.89)
TOTAL
21.13k
48.66k (x2.3)
Multithread
E5-2697 v2
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
73.17k
38.45k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
230.83k
155.68k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
107.14k
51k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.99k
18.26k (x2.28)
TOTAL
419.12k
263.38k (x0.63)
Performance/W
E5-2697 v2
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
563 points/W
405 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1776 points/W
1639 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
824 points/W
537 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
61 points/W
192 points/W
TOTAL
3224 points/W
2772 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2697 v2
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
982 points/GHz
1034 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2726 points/GHz
4230 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1203 points/GHz
1402 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1126 points/GHz
3065 points/GHz
TOTAL
6036 points/GHz
9731 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4