| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2697 v2 vs Core i9-7980XE


Description
The E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i9-7980XE is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2697 v2 gets a score of 419.1 k points while the i9-7980XE gets 600.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-7980XE is 1.4 times faster than the E5-2697 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306e4
50654
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Skylake-X
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
12 /24
18/36
TDP
130 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
18x32+18x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
18x1024 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
25344 kB
Date
September 2013
May 2017
Mean monothread perf.
27.92k points
76.43k points
Mean multithread perf.
633.14k points
1223.79k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2697 v2
i9-7980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
3.44k
4.89k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
9.54k
19.98k (x2.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.21k
6.14k (x1.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.94k
9.81k (x2.49)
TOTAL
21.13k
40.82k (x1.93)

Multithread

E5-2697 v2

i9-7980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
73.17k
79.8k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
230.83k
372.72k (x1.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
107.14k
121.42k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.99k
26.48k (x3.31)
TOTAL
419.12k
600.43k (x1.43)

Performance/W
E5-2697 v2
i9-7980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
563 points/W
484 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1776 points/W
2259 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
824 points/W
736 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
61 points/W
160 points/W
TOTAL
3224 points/W
3639 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2697 v2
i9-7980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
982 points/GHz
1111 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2726 points/GHz
4540 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1203 points/GHz
1397 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1126 points/GHz
2230 points/GHz
TOTAL
6036 points/GHz
9277 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4