| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2690 v3 vs Core i9-7980XE


Description
The E5-2690 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i9-7980XE is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 v3 gets a score of 1016.4 k points while the i9-7980XE gets 1223.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-7980XE is 1.2 times faster than the E5-2690 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
50654
Core
Haswell-EP
Skylake-X
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
12/24
18/36
TDP
135 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
18x32+18x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
18x1024 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
25344 kB
Date
September 2014
May 2017
Mean monothread perf.
40.71k points
76.43k points
Mean multithread perf.
1016.36k points
1223.79k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2690 v3
i9-7980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
20.96k
31.16k (x1.49)
Test#2 (FP)
11.74k
28.13k (x2.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
6.65k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
10.5k (x3.09)
TOTAL
40.71k
76.43k (x1.88)

Multithread

E5-2690 v3

i9-7980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
531.68k
560.19k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
342.28k
516.97k (x1.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
133.22k
123.94k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.19k
22.69k (x2.47)
TOTAL
1016.36k
1223.79k (x1.2)

Performance/W
E5-2690 v3
i9-7980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
3938 points/W
3395 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2535 points/W
3133 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
987 points/W
751 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
68 points/W
137 points/W
TOTAL
7529 points/W
7417 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2690 v3
i9-7980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
5988 points/GHz
7081 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3356 points/GHz
6392 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1318 points/GHz
1512 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
971 points/GHz
2386 points/GHz
TOTAL
11632 points/GHz
17371 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4