Xeon E5-2690 v3 vs Ryzen 7 1700
Description
The E5-2690 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the 1700 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 v3 gets a score of 1016.4 k points while the 1700 gets 333.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 v3 is 3 times faster than the 1700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 v3 gets a score of 1016.4 k points while the 1700 gets 333.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 v3 is 3 times faster than the 1700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
800f11
Core
Haswell-EP
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
AM4
Cores/Threads
12/24
8/16
TDP
135 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
September 2014
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
40.71k points
52.69k points
Mean multithread perf.
1016.36k points
333.31k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2690 v3
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
20.96k
12.65k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
11.74k
20.95k (x1.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
4.63k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
14.47k (x4.26)
TOTAL
40.71k
52.69k (x1.29)
Multithread
E5-2690 v3
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
531.68k
101.78k (x0.19)
Test#2 (FP)
342.28k
177.57k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
133.22k
47.18k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.19k
6.78k (x0.74)
TOTAL
1016.36k
333.31k (x0.33)
Performance/W
E5-2690 v3
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
3938 points/W
1566 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2535 points/W
2732 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
987 points/W
726 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
68 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
7529 points/W
5128 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2690 v3
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
5988 points/GHz
3419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3356 points/GHz
5661 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1318 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
971 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
TOTAL
11632 points/GHz
14241 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4