Xeon E5-2680 v4 vs Core i3-4030U
Description
The E5-2680 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the i3-4030U is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v4 gets a score of 1162.6 k points while the i3-4030U gets 46.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 25.2 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v4 gets a score of 1162.6 k points while the i3-4030U gets 46.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 25.2 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406f1
40651
Core
Broadwell-EP
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA1168
Cores/Threads
14/28
2/4
TDP
120 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
14x32+14x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
14x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
35840 kB
3072 kB
Date
March 2016
April 2014
Mean monothread perf.
41.35k points
21.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
1162.63k points
46.09k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2680 v4
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
17.8k
10.69k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
16.51k
6.16k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.47k
2.49k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.56k
2.23k (x0.87)
TOTAL
41.35k
21.57k (x0.52)
Multithread
E5-2680 v4
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
494.82k
21.84k (x0.04)
Test#2 (FP)
514.13k
15.86k (x0.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
132.87k
5.94k (x0.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.8k
2.45k (x0.12)
TOTAL
1162.63k
46.09k (x0.04)
Performance/W
E5-2680 v4
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
4124 points/W
1456 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4284 points/W
1057 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1107 points/W
396 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
163 points/W
TOTAL
9689 points/W
3073 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v4
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
5393 points/GHz
5627 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5004 points/GHz
3241 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1355 points/GHz
1312 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
777 points/GHz
1173 points/GHz
TOTAL
12529 points/GHz
11353 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4