| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs Core i9-9900K


Description
The E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 452.9 k points while the i9-9900K gets 545.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 1.2 times faster than the E5-2670 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
906ec
Core
Haswell-EP
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
12/24
8/16
TDP
120 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2014
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
36.41k points
86.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
452.9k points
545.3k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3.52k
5.17k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
8.68k
21.15k (x2.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.83k
7.01k (x2.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.13k
15.32k (x4.9)
TOTAL
18.17k
48.66k (x2.68)

Multithread

E5-2670 v3

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
32.7k
38.45k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
105.18k
155.68k (x1.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.18k
51k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.54k
18.26k (x1.91)
TOTAL
182.59k
263.38k (x1.44)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
18.62k
33.62k (x1.81)
Test#2 (FP)
10.49k
30.02k (x2.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.04k
7.17k (x1.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.26k
15.43k (x4.73)
TOTAL
36.41k
86.24k (x2.37)

Multithread

E5-2670 v3

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
236.25k
248.93k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
151.05k
224.43k (x1.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
58.9k
53.39k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
18.54k (x2.77)
TOTAL
452.9k
545.3k (x1.2)

Performance/W
E5-2670 v3
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
1969 points/W
2620 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1259 points/W
2362 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
491 points/W
562 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
56 points/W
195 points/W
TOTAL
3774 points/W
5740 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2670 v3
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
6006 points/GHz
6724 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3385 points/GHz
6003 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1303 points/GHz
1434 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1052 points/GHz
3087 points/GHz
TOTAL
11745 points/GHz
17247 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4