Xeon E3-1270 v2 vs Core i7-4770K
Description
The E3-1270 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i7-4770K is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1270 v2 gets a score of 139.4 k points while the i7-4770K gets 146.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4770K is 1.1 times faster than the E3-1270 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1270 v2 gets a score of 139.4 k points while the i7-4770K gets 146.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4770K is 1.1 times faster than the E3-1270 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
306c3
Core
Ivy Bridge-H2
Haswell
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4 /8
4/8
TDP
69 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
May 2012
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
36.29k points
43.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
139.38k points
173.93k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E3-1270 v2
i7-4770K
Test#1 (Integers)
13.16k
13.78k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
12.51k
12.7k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5k
5.23k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.62k
4.92k (x0.88)
TOTAL
36.29k
36.63k (x1.01)
Multithread
E3-1270 v2
i7-4770K
Test#1 (Integers)
51.89k
56.86k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
57.35k
60.65k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.74k
24.02k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.4k
5.22k (x0.82)
TOTAL
139.38k
146.75k (x1.05)
Performance/W
E3-1270 v2
i7-4770K
Test#1 (Integers)
752 points/W
677 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
831 points/W
722 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
344 points/W
286 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
93 points/W
62 points/W
TOTAL
2020 points/W
1747 points/W
Performance/GHz
E3-1270 v2
i7-4770K
Test#1 (Integers)
3374 points/GHz
3534 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3207 points/GHz
3256 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1282 points/GHz
1341 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1441 points/GHz
1261 points/GHz
TOTAL
9304 points/GHz
9392 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4