Xeon E3-1270 v2 vs Core i5-9500T
Description
The E3-1270 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i5-9500T is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1270 v2 gets a score of 139.4 k points while the i5-9500T gets 211.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9500T is 1.5 times faster than the E3-1270 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1270 v2 gets a score of 139.4 k points while the i5-9500T gets 211.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9500T is 1.5 times faster than the E3-1270 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
906ea
Core
Ivy Bridge-H2
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4 /8
6/6
TDP
69 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
9216 kB
Date
May 2012
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
36.29k points
61.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
139.38k points
274.02k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E3-1270 v2
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
13.16k
13.46k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
12.51k
20.21k (x1.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5k
4.72k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.62k
10.25k (x1.82)
TOTAL
36.29k
48.64k (x1.34)
Multithread
E3-1270 v2
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
51.89k
74.65k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
57.35k
110.86k (x1.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.74k
22.08k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.4k
4.12k (x0.64)
TOTAL
139.38k
211.7k (x1.52)
Performance/W
E3-1270 v2
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
752 points/W
2133 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
831 points/W
3167 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
344 points/W
631 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
93 points/W
118 points/W
TOTAL
2020 points/W
6049 points/W
Performance/GHz
E3-1270 v2
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
3374 points/GHz
3638 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3207 points/GHz
5462 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1282 points/GHz
1275 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1441 points/GHz
2771 points/GHz
TOTAL
9304 points/GHz
13145 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4