| | | | | | |

Pentium Dual-Core E2200 vs Xeon E5645


Description
The E2200 is based on Core architecture while the E5645 is based on Westmere.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E2200 gets a score of 15.4 k points while the E5645 gets 77 k points.

Summarizing, the E5645 is 5 times faster than the E2200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
6fd
206c2
Core
Allendale
Westmere-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/2
6 /6
TDP
65 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
12288 kB
Date
December 2007
March 2010
Mean monothread perf.
8.29k points
15.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
15.44k points
76.96k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E2200
E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
2.22k
1.78k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
2.22k
3.91k (x1.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.22k
2.52k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.17k
2.42k (x2.07)
TOTAL
7.81k
10.64k (x1.36)

Multithread

E2200

E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
4.41k
9.67k (x2.19)
Test#2 (FP)
4.42k
22.92k (x5.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.45k
14.31k (x3.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.18k
3.81k (x3.22)
TOTAL
14.45k
50.7k (x3.51)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E2200
E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
2.53k
6.47k (x2.56)
Test#2 (FP)
2.3k
4.4k (x1.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.31k
2.43k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.16k
2.33k (x2)
TOTAL
8.29k
15.64k (x1.89)

Multithread

E2200

E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
5.06k
34.43k (x6.81)
Test#2 (FP)
4.58k
24.23k (x5.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
14.48k (x3.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.18k
3.81k (x3.23)
TOTAL
15.44k
76.96k (x4.99)

Performance/W
E2200
E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
78 points/W
430 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
70 points/W
303 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
71 points/W
181 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
18 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
237 points/W
962 points/W

Performance/GHz
E2200
E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
1149 points/GHz
2311 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1044 points/GHz
1573 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1048 points/GHz
867 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
529 points/GHz
833 points/GHz
TOTAL
3770 points/GHz
5584 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4