Pentium Dual-Core E2200 vs Core 2 Duo P8600
Description
Both models E2200 and P8600 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E2200 gets a score of 15.4 k points while the P8600 gets 21 k points.
Summarizing, the P8600 is 1.4 times faster than the E2200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E2200 gets a score of 15.4 k points while the P8600 gets 21 k points.
Summarizing, the P8600 is 1.4 times faster than the E2200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6fd
10676
Core
Allendale
Penryn-3M
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA 479
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
3072 kB
Date
December 2007
July 2008
Mean monothread perf.
8.29k points
12.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
15.44k points
20.99k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E2200
P8600
Test#1 (Integers)
2.53k
2.76k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
2.3k
6.11k (x2.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.31k
2.3k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.16k
1.25k (x1.07)
TOTAL
8.29k
12.41k (x1.5)
Multithread
E2200
P8600
Test#1 (Integers)
5.06k
4.94k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
4.58k
10.59k (x2.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
4.22k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.18k
1.24k (x1.05)
TOTAL
15.44k
20.99k (x1.36)
Performance/W
E2200
P8600
Test#1 (Integers)
78 points/W
198 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
70 points/W
424 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
71 points/W
169 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
18 points/W
50 points/W
TOTAL
237 points/W
840 points/W
Performance/GHz
E2200
P8600
Test#1 (Integers)
1149 points/GHz
1151 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1044 points/GHz
2545 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1048 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
529 points/GHz
520 points/GHz
TOTAL
3770 points/GHz
5173 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4