| | | |

Pentium D 925 vs Pentium Dual-Core E2200


Description
The 925 is based on NetBurst architecture while the E2200 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 925 gets a score of 14 k points while the E2200 gets 15.4 k points.

Summarizing, the E2200 is 1.1 times faster than the 925. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
f65
6fd
Core
Presler
Allendale
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16+8 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
1024 kB
Date
October 2006
December 2007

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
925
E2200
Test#1 (Integers)
1521
2215 (45.62%)
Test#2 (FP)
2948
2215 (-24.86%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1506
2216 (47.18%)
Test#1 (Memory)
816
1169 (43.17%)
TOTAL
6791
7815 (15.07%)

Multithread

925

E2200
Test#1 (Integers)
2982
4409 (47.85%)
Test#2 (FP)
5616
4420 (-21.30%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2870
4445 (54.89%)
Test#1 (Memory)
819
1181 (44.25%)
TOTAL
12287
14455 (17.65%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
925
E2200
Test#1 (Integers)
2059
2527 (22.70%)
Test#2 (FP)
3316
2297 (-30.74%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1522
2306 (51.52%)
Test#1 (Memory)
799
1165 (45.76%)
TOTAL
7696
8294 (7.77%)

Multithread

925

E2200
Test#1 (Integers)
3995
5060 (26.64%)
Test#2 (FP)
6318
4582 (-27.48%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2905
4614 (58.81%)
Test#1 (Memory)
808
1181 (46.10%)
TOTAL
14027
15436 (10.04%)

Performance/W
925
E2200
Test#1 (Integers)
42 points/W
78 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
67 points/W
70 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31 points/W
71 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
9 points/W
18 points/W
TOTAL
148 points/W
237 points/W

Performance/GHz
925
E2200
Test#1 (Integers)
686 points/GHz
1149 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1105 points/GHz
1044 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
507 points/GHz
1048 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
266 points/GHz
529 points/GHz
TOTAL
2565 points/GHz
3770 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8