Core 2 Duo P8600 vs Pentium Dual-Core E2200
Description
Both models P8600 and E2200 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the P8600 gets a score of 21 k points while the E2200 gets 15.4 k points.
Summarizing, the P8600 is 1.4 times faster than the E2200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the P8600 gets a score of 21 k points while the E2200 gets 15.4 k points.
Summarizing, the P8600 is 1.4 times faster than the E2200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
10676
6fd
Core
Penryn-3M
Allendale
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 479
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
25 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
3072 kB
1024 kB
Date
July 2008
December 2007
Mean monothread perf.
12.41k points
8.29k points
Mean multithread perf.
20.99k points
15.44k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
P8600
E2200
Test#1 (Integers)
2.76k
2.53k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
6.11k
2.3k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.3k
2.31k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.25k
1.16k (x0.93)
TOTAL
12.41k
8.29k (x0.67)
Multithread
P8600
E2200
Test#1 (Integers)
4.94k
5.06k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
10.59k
4.58k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.22k
4.61k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.24k
1.18k (x0.95)
TOTAL
20.99k
15.44k (x0.74)
Performance/W
P8600
E2200
Test#1 (Integers)
198 points/W
78 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
424 points/W
70 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
169 points/W
71 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
50 points/W
18 points/W
TOTAL
840 points/W
237 points/W
Performance/GHz
P8600
E2200
Test#1 (Integers)
1151 points/GHz
1149 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2545 points/GHz
1044 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/GHz
1048 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
520 points/GHz
529 points/GHz
TOTAL
5173 points/GHz
3770 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4