| | | | | | |

Core i9-9900K vs i9-10900X


Description
The i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i9-10900X is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900K gets a score of 545.3 k points while the i9-10900X gets 632.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10900X is 1.2 times faster than the i9-9900K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ec
50657
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Cascade Lake-X
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
8/16
10/20
TDP
95 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
10x1024 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
19712 kB
Date
October 2018
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
86.24k points
62.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
545.3k points
632.35k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9900K
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
33.62k
25.97k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
30.02k
22.37k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.17k
5.3k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.43k
8.63k (x0.56)
TOTAL
86.24k
62.28k (x0.72)

Multithread

i9-9900K

i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
248.93k
281.98k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
224.43k
259.01k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.39k
64.87k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.54k
26.5k (x1.43)
TOTAL
545.3k
632.35k (x1.16)

Performance/W
i9-9900K
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
2620 points/W
1709 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2362 points/W
1570 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
562 points/W
393 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
195 points/W
161 points/W
TOTAL
5740 points/W
3832 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-9900K
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
6724 points/GHz
5526 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6003 points/GHz
4760 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1434 points/GHz
1128 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3087 points/GHz
1835 points/GHz
TOTAL
17247 points/GHz
13250 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4