| | | | | | |

Core i9-9900K vs i7-11800H (ES)


Description
The i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900K gets a score of 545.3 k points while the i7-11800H (ES) gets 709.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11800H (ES) is 1.3 times faster than the i9-9900K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ec
806d0
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Tiger Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
95 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
24576 kB
Date
October 2018
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
86.24k points
81.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
545.3k points
709.85k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i9-9900K
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
5.17k
4.4k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
21.15k
20.25k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.01k
11.69k (x1.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.32k
11.66k (x0.76)
TOTAL
48.66k
48.01k (x0.99)

Multithread

i9-9900K

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
38.45k
38.93k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
155.68k
191.89k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
51k
108.8k (x2.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.26k
14.95k (x0.82)
TOTAL
263.38k
354.57k (x1.35)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9900K
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
33.62k
30.84k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
30.02k
26.38k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.17k
12.66k (x1.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.43k
11.74k (x0.76)
TOTAL
86.24k
81.62k (x0.95)

Multithread

i9-9900K

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
248.93k
294.86k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
224.43k
280.92k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.39k
113.9k (x2.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.54k
20.16k (x1.09)
TOTAL
545.3k
709.85k (x1.3)

Performance/W
i9-9900K
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
2620 points/W
6553 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2362 points/W
6243 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
562 points/W
2531 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
195 points/W
448 points/W
TOTAL
5740 points/W
15774 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-9900K
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
6724 points/GHz
6705 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6003 points/GHz
5734 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1434 points/GHz
2752 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3087 points/GHz
2552 points/GHz
TOTAL
17247 points/GHz
17744 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4