Core i9-9900K vs Ryzen Z1 Extreme
Description
The i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the Z1 Extreme is based on Zen 4.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900K gets a score of 545.3 k points while the Z1 Extreme gets 553.4 k points.
Summarizing, the Z1 Extreme is 1 times faster than the i9-9900K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900K gets a score of 545.3 k points while the Z1 Extreme gets 553.4 k points.
Summarizing, the Z1 Extreme is 1 times faster than the i9-9900K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ec
a70f41
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Phoenix
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
5.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
95 W
30 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
October 2018
June 2023
Mean monothread perf.
86.24k points
101.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
545.3k points
553.41k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9900K
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
33.62k
32.74k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
30.02k
27.35k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.17k
14.23k (x1.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.43k
27.41k (x1.78)
TOTAL
86.24k
101.73k (x1.18)
Multithread
i9-9900K
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
248.93k
236.69k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
224.43k
202.63k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.39k
102.8k (x1.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.54k
11.28k (x0.61)
TOTAL
545.3k
553.41k (x1.01)
Performance/W
i9-9900K
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
2620 points/W
7890 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2362 points/W
6754 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
562 points/W
3427 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
195 points/W
376 points/W
TOTAL
5740 points/W
18447 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-9900K
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
6724 points/GHz
6419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6003 points/GHz
5363 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1434 points/GHz
2789 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3087 points/GHz
5375 points/GHz
TOTAL
17247 points/GHz
19946 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4