Core i9-9900K vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
Description
The i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 4900HS is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900K gets a score of 545.3 k points while the 4900HS gets 360.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 1.5 times faster than the 4900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900K gets a score of 545.3 k points while the 4900HS gets 360.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 1.5 times faster than the 4900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ec
860f01
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Renoir
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
95 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
October 2018
March 2020
Mean monothread perf.
86.24k points
53k points
Mean multithread perf.
545.3k points
360.57k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9900K
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
33.62k
14.87k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
30.02k
21.53k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.17k
8.39k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.43k
8.21k (x0.53)
TOTAL
86.24k
53k (x0.61)
Multithread
i9-9900K
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
248.93k
124.63k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
224.43k
158.62k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.39k
69.79k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.54k
7.53k (x0.41)
TOTAL
545.3k
360.57k (x0.66)
Performance/W
i9-9900K
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
2620 points/W
3561 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2362 points/W
4532 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
562 points/W
1994 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
195 points/W
215 points/W
TOTAL
5740 points/W
10302 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-9900K
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
6724 points/GHz
3457 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6003 points/GHz
5007 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1434 points/GHz
1952 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3087 points/GHz
1910 points/GHz
TOTAL
17247 points/GHz
12326 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4