| | | | | | |

Core i9-9900K vs Ryzen 7 4700U


Description
The i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 4700U is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900K gets a score of 545.3 k points while the 4700U gets 269.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 2 times faster than the 4700U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ec
860f01
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Renoir
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/8
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
October 2018
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
86.24k points
49.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
545.3k points
269.56k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9900K
4700U
Test#1 (Integers)
33.62k
10.38k (x0.31)
Test#2 (FP)
30.02k
22.63k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.17k
8.52k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.43k
7.99k (x0.52)
TOTAL
86.24k
49.53k (x0.57)

Multithread

i9-9900K

4700U
Test#1 (Integers)
248.93k
86.74k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
224.43k
128.69k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.39k
48.71k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.54k
5.41k (x0.29)
TOTAL
545.3k
269.56k (x0.49)

Performance/W
i9-9900K
4700U
Test#1 (Integers)
2620 points/W
5783 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2362 points/W
8579 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
562 points/W
3248 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
195 points/W
360 points/W
TOTAL
5740 points/W
17970 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-9900K
4700U
Test#1 (Integers)
6724 points/GHz
2533 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6003 points/GHz
5520 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1434 points/GHz
2078 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3087 points/GHz
1949 points/GHz
TOTAL
17247 points/GHz
12080 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4