| | | | | | |

Core i9-9900K vs Ryzen 7 1800X


Description
The i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 1800X is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900K gets a score of 545.3 k points while the 1800X gets 410.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 1.3 times faster than the 1800X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ec
800f11
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
95 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
October 2018
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
86.24k points
61.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
545.3k points
410.47k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i9-9900K
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
5.17k
4.14k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
21.15k
19.07k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.01k
5.77k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.32k
18.28k (x1.19)
TOTAL
48.66k
47.26k (x0.97)

Multithread

i9-9900K

1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
38.45k
34.48k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
155.68k
169.65k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
51k
63.68k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.26k
8.2k (x0.45)
TOTAL
263.38k
276.01k (x1.05)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9900K
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
33.62k
15.02k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
30.02k
24.26k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.17k
5.53k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.43k
16.26k (x1.05)
TOTAL
86.24k
61.07k (x0.71)

Multithread

i9-9900K

1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
248.93k
122.92k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
224.43k
220.32k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.39k
59.78k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.54k
7.44k (x0.4)
TOTAL
545.3k
410.47k (x0.75)

Performance/W
i9-9900K
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
2620 points/W
1294 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2362 points/W
2319 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
562 points/W
629 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
195 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
5740 points/W
4321 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-9900K
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
6724 points/GHz
3756 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6003 points/GHz
6065 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1434 points/GHz
1382 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3087 points/GHz
4065 points/GHz
TOTAL
17247 points/GHz
15267 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4