| | | | | | |

Core i9-9900K vs Ryzen 5 3600


Description
The i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 3600 is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900K gets a score of 545.3 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 1.6 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ec
870f10
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
32768 kB
Date
October 2018
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
86.24k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
545.3k points
348.35k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i9-9900K
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
5.17k
4.2k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
21.15k
17.36k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.01k
7.5k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.32k
23.79k (x1.55)
TOTAL
48.66k
52.85k (x1.09)

Multithread

i9-9900K

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
38.45k
22.11k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
155.68k
108.04k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
51k
56.81k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.26k
36.39k (x1.99)
TOTAL
263.38k
223.36k (x0.85)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9900K
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
33.62k
16.04k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
30.02k
24.47k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.17k
8.38k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.43k
21.66k (x1.4)
TOTAL
86.24k
70.55k (x0.82)

Multithread

i9-9900K

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
248.93k
113.63k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
224.43k
143.55k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.39k
63.84k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.54k
27.34k (x1.47)
TOTAL
545.3k
348.35k (x0.64)

Performance/W
i9-9900K
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
2620 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2362 points/W
2208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
562 points/W
982 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
195 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
5740 points/W
5359 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-9900K
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
6724 points/GHz
3819 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6003 points/GHz
5825 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1434 points/GHz
1995 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3087 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
17247 points/GHz
16797 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4