Core i9-9880H vs Ryzen 7 1700
Description
The i9-9880H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 1700 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9880H gets a score of 381.5 k points while the 1700 gets 333.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9880H is 1.1 times faster than the 1700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9880H gets a score of 381.5 k points while the 1700 gets 333.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9880H is 1.1 times faster than the 1700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ed
800f11
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16386 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2019
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
73.53k points
52.69k points
Mean multithread perf.
381.53k points
333.31k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9880H
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
27.81k
12.65k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
25.88k
20.95k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.65k
4.63k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.19k
14.47k (x1.02)
TOTAL
73.53k
52.69k (x0.72)
Multithread
i9-9880H
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
175.69k
101.78k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
166.56k
177.57k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.04k
47.18k (x1.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.23k
6.78k (x1.6)
TOTAL
381.53k
333.31k (x0.87)
Performance/W
i9-9880H
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
3904 points/W
1566 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3701 points/W
2732 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
779 points/W
726 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
94 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
8478 points/W
5128 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-9880H
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
5793 points/GHz
3419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5392 points/GHz
5661 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1178 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2956 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
TOTAL
15319 points/GHz
14241 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4