Core i9-7980XE vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
Description
The i9-7980XE is based on Skylake architecture while the 4800HS is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-7980XE gets a score of 1223.8 k points while the 4800HS gets 427.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-7980XE is 2.9 times faster than the 4800HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-7980XE gets a score of 1223.8 k points while the 4800HS gets 427.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-7980XE is 2.9 times faster than the 4800HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50654
860f01
Core
Skylake-X
Renoir
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
18/36
8/16
TDP
165 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
18x32+18x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
18x1024 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
25344 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
May 2017
March 2020
Mean monothread perf.
76.43k points
61.12k points
Mean multithread perf.
1223.79k points
427.61k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-7980XE
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
31.16k
16.66k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
28.13k
26.01k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.65k
9.31k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.5k
9.15k (x0.87)
TOTAL
76.43k
61.12k (x0.8)
Multithread
i9-7980XE
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
560.19k
144.48k (x0.26)
Test#2 (FP)
516.97k
192.46k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
123.94k
83.17k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.69k
7.51k (x0.33)
TOTAL
1223.79k
427.61k (x0.35)
Performance/W
i9-7980XE
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
3395 points/W
4128 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3133 points/W
5499 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
751 points/W
2376 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
137 points/W
214 points/W
TOTAL
7417 points/W
12218 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-7980XE
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
7081 points/GHz
3966 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6392 points/GHz
6194 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1512 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2386 points/GHz
2177 points/GHz
TOTAL
17371 points/GHz
14553 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4