| | | | | | |

Core i9-7980XE vs i9-13900KF


Description
The i9-7980XE is based on Skylake architecture while the i9-13900KF is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-7980XE gets a score of 1223.8 k points while the i9-13900KF gets 1660 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900KF is 1.4 times faster than the i9-7980XE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50654
b0671
Core
Skylake-X
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Skylake
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
5.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
18/36
24/32
TDP
165 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
18x32+18x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
18x1024 kB
8x2048/4x4096 kB
Cache L3
25344 kB
36864 kB
Date
May 2017
September 2022
Mean monothread perf.
76.43k points
128.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
1223.79k points
1660.01k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-7980XE
i9-13900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
31.16k
61.1k (x1.96)
Test#2 (FP)
28.13k
31.23k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.65k
17.57k (x2.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.5k
18.89k (x1.8)
TOTAL
76.43k
128.79k (x1.69)

Multithread

i9-7980XE

i9-13900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
560.19k
767.22k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
516.97k
576.38k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
123.94k
284.31k (x2.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.69k
32.09k (x1.41)
TOTAL
1223.79k
1660.01k (x1.36)

Performance/W
i9-7980XE
i9-13900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
3395 points/W
6138 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3133 points/W
4611 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
751 points/W
2274 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
137 points/W
257 points/W
TOTAL
7417 points/W
13280 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-7980XE
i9-13900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
7081 points/GHz
10535 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6392 points/GHz
5384 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1512 points/GHz
3030 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2386 points/GHz
3257 points/GHz
TOTAL
17371 points/GHz
22206 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4