Core i9-14900K vs Ryzen 5 1600X
Description
The i9-14900K is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 1600X is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-14900K gets a score of 1756.6 k points while the 1600X gets 173.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-14900K is 10.1 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-14900K gets a score of 1756.6 k points while the 1600X gets 173.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-14900K is 10.1 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b0671
800f11
Core
Raptor Lake-
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
6 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
24/32
6/12
TDP
125 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
October 2023
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
137.37k points
60.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
1756.59k points
173.2k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-14900K
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
63.55k
14.63k (x0.23)
Test#2 (FP)
32.3k
24.09k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.92k
5.51k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.61k
15.86k (x0.7)
TOTAL
137.37k
60.09k (x0.44)
Multithread
i9-14900K
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
813.87k
48.75k (x0.06)
Test#2 (FP)
608.32k
80.1k (x0.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
313.09k
24.5k (x0.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.31k
19.85k (x0.93)
TOTAL
1756.59k
173.2k (x0.1)
Performance/W
i9-14900K
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
6511 points/W
513 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4867 points/W
843 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2505 points/W
258 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
170 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
14053 points/W
1823 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-14900K
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
10591 points/GHz
3659 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5383 points/GHz
6022 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3153 points/GHz
1378 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3768 points/GHz
3966 points/GHz
TOTAL
22895 points/GHz
15023 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4