| | | | | | |

Core i9-10980XE vs Ryzen 7 1700


Description
The i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the 1700 is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10980XE gets a score of 1241.1 k points while the 1700 gets 333.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 3.7 times faster than the 1700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
800f11
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
AM4
Cores/Threads
18/36
8/16
TDP
165 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
18x32+18x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
18x1024 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
25344 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
November 2019
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
68.33k points
52.69k points
Mean multithread perf.
1241.12k points
333.31k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
16.4k
13.95k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
20.97k
22.02k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.82k
5.17k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.86k
16.61k (x1.88)
TOTAL
52.05k
57.75k (x1.11)

Multithread

i9-10980XE

1700
Test#1 (Integers)
316.84k
120.59k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
461.09k
197.34k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
129.82k
56.83k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.09k
6.41k (x0.29)
TOTAL
929.85k
381.16k (x0.41)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
29.53k
12.65k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
22.59k
20.95k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.99k
4.63k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.22k
14.47k (x1.42)
TOTAL
68.33k
52.69k (x0.77)

Multithread

i9-10980XE

1700
Test#1 (Integers)
587.06k
101.78k (x0.17)
Test#2 (FP)
496.41k
177.57k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
134.66k
47.18k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.99k
6.78k (x0.3)
TOTAL
1241.12k
333.31k (x0.27)

Performance/W
i9-10980XE
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
3558 points/W
1566 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3009 points/W
2732 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
816 points/W
726 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
7522 points/W
5128 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-10980XE
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
6153 points/GHz
3419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4707 points/GHz
5661 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2129 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
TOTAL
14236 points/GHz
14241 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4