Core i9-10900K vs Ryzen 7 1700
Description
The i9-10900K is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 1700 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900K gets a score of 685.6 k points while the 1700 gets 333.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900K is 2.1 times faster than the 1700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900K gets a score of 685.6 k points while the 1700 gets 333.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900K is 2.1 times faster than the 1700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0655
800f11
Core
Comet Lake-S
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
10/20
8/16
TDP
125 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2020
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
80.41k points
52.69k points
Mean multithread perf.
685.65k points
333.31k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10900K
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
32.67k
12.65k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
28.49k
20.95k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.53k
4.63k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.72k
14.47k (x1.14)
TOTAL
80.41k
52.69k (x0.66)
Multithread
i9-10900K
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
307.39k
101.78k (x0.33)
Test#2 (FP)
298.47k
177.57k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.94k
47.18k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.85k
6.78k (x0.99)
TOTAL
685.65k
333.31k (x0.49)
Performance/W
i9-10900K
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
2459 points/W
1566 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2388 points/W
2732 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
583 points/W
726 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
5485 points/W
5128 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-10900K
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
6282 points/GHz
3419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5479 points/GHz
5661 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1257 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2445 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
TOTAL
15463 points/GHz
14241 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4