Core i7-9850H vs Ryzen 5 3600X
Description
The i7-9850H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 3600X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9850H gets a score of 289.3 k points while the 3600X gets 376.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600X is 1.3 times faster than the i7-9850H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9850H gets a score of 289.3 k points while the 3600X gets 376.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600X is 1.3 times faster than the i7-9850H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ed
870f10
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Matisse
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
45 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x16384 kB
Date
June 2019
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
49.24k points
69.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
289.3k points
376.22k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9850H
3600X
Test#1 (Integers)
19.83k
16.21k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
16.52k
22.99k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.87k
8.76k (x2.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.02k
21.94k (x2.43)
TOTAL
49.24k
69.9k (x1.42)
Multithread
i7-9850H
3600X
Test#1 (Integers)
130.19k
121.94k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
121.44k
153.22k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.05k
67.74k (x2.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.62k
33.31k (x3.46)
TOTAL
289.3k
376.22k (x1.3)
Performance/W
i7-9850H
3600X
Test#1 (Integers)
2893 points/W
1284 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2699 points/W
1613 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
623 points/W
713 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
214 points/W
351 points/W
TOTAL
6429 points/W
3960 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-9850H
3600X
Test#1 (Integers)
4311 points/GHz
3685 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3591 points/GHz
5225 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
841 points/GHz
1991 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1961 points/GHz
4986 points/GHz
TOTAL
10703 points/GHz
15887 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4