Core i7-9700K vs Ryzen Z1 Extreme
Description
The i7-9700K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the Z1 Extreme is based on Zen 4.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9700K gets a score of 460 k points while the Z1 Extreme gets 553.4 k points.
Summarizing, the Z1 Extreme is 1.2 times faster than the i7-9700K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9700K gets a score of 460 k points while the Z1 Extreme gets 553.4 k points.
Summarizing, the Z1 Extreme is 1.2 times faster than the i7-9700K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ec
a70f41
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Phoenix
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
5.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA
Cores/Threads
8/8
8/16
TDP
95 W
30 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
October 2018
June 2023
Mean monothread perf.
73.62k points
101.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
460.02k points
553.41k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9700K
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
29.3k
32.74k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
25.61k
27.35k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.86k
14.23k (x2.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.86k
27.41k (x2.13)
TOTAL
73.62k
101.73k (x1.38)
Multithread
i7-9700K
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
217.77k
236.69k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
190.46k
202.63k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.48k
102.8k (x2.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.31k
11.28k (x1)
TOTAL
460.02k
553.41k (x1.2)
Performance/W
i7-9700K
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
2292 points/W
7890 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2005 points/W
6754 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
426 points/W
3427 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
119 points/W
376 points/W
TOTAL
4842 points/W
18447 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-9700K
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
5981 points/GHz
6419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5226 points/GHz
5363 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1195 points/GHz
2789 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2624 points/GHz
5375 points/GHz
TOTAL
15025 points/GHz
19946 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4