Core i7-9700F vs Ryzen 5 1600X
Description
The i7-9700F is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 1600X is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9700F gets a score of 164.3 k points while the 1600X gets 124.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9700F is 1.3 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9700F gets a score of 164.3 k points while the 1600X gets 124.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9700F is 1.3 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ed
800f11
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/8
6/12
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2019
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
60.93k points
60.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
269.85k points
173.2k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-9700F
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
4.67k
3.95k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
17.16k
18.36k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.7k
5.39k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.37k
17.35k (x1.21)
TOTAL
41.9k
45.06k (x1.08)
Multithread
i7-9700F
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
26.31k
19.47k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
97.53k
77.19k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31.53k
15.4k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.94k
12.25k (x1.37)
TOTAL
164.31k
124.3k (x0.76)
Performance/W
i7-9700F
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
405 points/W
205 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1500 points/W
813 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
485 points/W
162 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
138 points/W
129 points/W
TOTAL
2528 points/W
1308 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-9700F
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
994 points/GHz
988 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3652 points/GHz
4591 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1212 points/GHz
1348 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3057 points/GHz
4338 points/GHz
TOTAL
8915 points/GHz
11265 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4