Core i7-8650U vs Ryzen 7 1700
Description
The i7-8650U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 1700 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8650U gets a score of 173.5 k points while the 1700 gets 333.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700 is 1.9 times faster than the i7-8650U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8650U gets a score of 173.5 k points while the 1700 gets 333.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700 is 1.9 times faster than the i7-8650U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
800f11
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
August 2017
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
55.86k points
52.69k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.49k points
333.31k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-8650U
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
21.61k
12.65k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
19.69k
20.95k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
4.63k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.95k
14.47k (x1.45)
TOTAL
55.86k
52.69k (x0.94)
Multithread
i7-8650U
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
78.38k
101.78k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
72.02k
177.57k (x2.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.95k
47.18k (x2.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.15k
6.78k (x1.1)
TOTAL
173.49k
333.31k (x1.92)
Performance/W
i7-8650U
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
5225 points/W
1566 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4802 points/W
2732 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1130 points/W
726 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
410 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
11566 points/W
5128 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-8650U
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
5146 points/GHz
3419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4689 points/GHz
5661 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1097 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2368 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
TOTAL
13300 points/GHz
14241 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4